30 November 2007
Ken Campbell, Iowa wrote:
Hi Joe... hey that is just the most funnest thing !!
However ( oh shucks here it comes ... ) ... the answer needs to be formatted to 4 decimal places, and the fourth place needs to be rounded to nearest.
This is not as anal as it seems, because a lot of shooters are using 36X scopes, and with a good micrometer adjustment, are trying for 1/10 or 1/8 inch impact movement at the target. and on the existing answer readout, this will not register.
the cell can be formatted ( under the format tool ) to the 4th decimal ... and I think you type RND into the formula although I am too twitilated this morning to remember ...
Hey, if you keep up the good work, someday someone may even thank you.
what the Heck, I will do that right now ...
THANK YOU JOE !!!
regards, ken campbell, up too late and thinking about breakfast ...
I first thought I understood what you wrote, now know that I don't.
This all has to do with iron sights, not scopes.
x.xxx is the best any irons can do, when we start to ask the questions about repeatability, linearity, approach direction etc.
I'm stickin with resolution to the nearest thousandth, another digit introduces mythical notions about precision.