MV AND CHRONOGRAPHING

  • 190 Views
  • Last Post 07 July 2018
joeb33050 posted this 05 July 2018

 

MV AND CHRONOGRAPHING

 

Muzzle Velocity is a function of powder charge, all other things being equal. More powder makes more MV.

 

The relationship, over some area, is kinda linear. Linear relationships, equations, are defined by the slope of the line and the height of the line above zero.

 

The slope, the angle up, is similar, for the lines in the two graphs shown in the post: MUZZLE VELOCITY VS. GRAINS OF POWDER.

 

I suspect that this slope is a characteristic of the powder, Titegroup in this case-I don’t know.

 

The chronographing goal for this testing was 12, now 13 measured shots. Collecting data carries a price, in my case the chronographing affects accuracy-that’s the price.

 

A sample size of 25 or 30 makes a better estimator of MV than samples of 12 or 13. There are 3 bullets, 7 powder charges and 10 barrels being investigated.

 

But.

 

If we assume that the slope is constant, and if sample size = EX 30, then we can measure MV for 30 shots at, say, 8.5 gr Titegroup, apply the slope, and get good estimates of MV at each charge from 5.5 to 8.5 gr Titegroup.

 

The 7 charges from 5.5-8.5 gr X 13 = 91 shots chronographed; vs. the 30 EX above.

 

Or, 30 @ 5.5 gr and 30@ 8.5 gr. Or 20@ 5.5 gr, 20@7 gr, 20@ 8.5 gr. 60<91.

 

If we know the slope, we can increase chronographing accuracy and reduce the number of shots measured.

 

Attached Files

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
GP Idaho posted this 05 July 2018

Joe writes, chronographing affects accuracy, that's the price.  A month ago I would have whole heartedly agreed with Joe.  The sky screens are a distraction and strap on the barrel units I suspect affect the harmonics.  I'm still getting used to the unit but I'm very pleased with my new LabRadar.  No more shot-up sky screens and much more down range data than the conventional chronographs.Gp

 

 

Attached Files

John Carlson posted this 06 July 2018

I've used the Pro Chrono for several years.  No distraction at least when shooting with a scope, I just don't see it.  Usually just a bunch of extra data that really doesn't tell me much but occasionally it proves to be quite valuable.  Not all 200 gr bullets exit the muzzle at the same velocity with a given powder charge.  Some vary by a bunch.  Knowing my rifle likes it's 200 gr bullets to exit at 1525fps can shorten my load development expenses significantly tough my experience with cast bullets has been a lot less definitive than with jacketed.

John Carlson. CBA Director of Military Competition.

Attached Files

joeb33050 posted this 07 July 2018

Joe writes, chronographing affects accuracy, that's the price.  A month ago I would have whole heartedly agreed with Joe.  The sky screens are a distraction and strap on the barrel units I suspect affect the harmonics.  I'm still getting used to the unit but I'm very pleased with my new LabRadar.  No more shot-up sky screens and much more down range data than the conventional chronographs.Gp

 I use the strap on chrono. Accuracy suffers as I write down MV, forget to write down MV and scroll back the chrono, forget to load the gun, -chrono adds to my thrashing about, < accuracy.

There are many ~ 50 shot tests needed. ?

 

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • RicinYakima
Close