Trail Boss ... under-appreciated ugly stepchild ??

  • 1.2K Views
  • Last Post 08 April 2019
Ken Campbell Iowa posted this 05 January 2019

i am out of unique ... i need to visit scheels ... i will steel myself and only take 3 twenties in my pocket ...  i have already decided to try some of that strange Trail Boss in my plinker loads ... 30 cal to 45-70 ....

i gotta try Trail Boss ...  in working on the FS index, i keep reading about success with Trail Boss ....  

why aren't more people using Trail Boss ? ... there aren't exactly tons of loading dope online ...  it appears that it will cover a wide range of reduced loads.

if we had 3 or 6 reports here with trailboss, that would be more than the entire base of loads available anywhere ...  experiences and comments welcome ...

ken

 

 

 

Attached Files

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
RicinYakima posted this 05 January 2019

It is hard to work with; it is light and fluffy so floats off if there is air-conditioning in the room. It will meter fairly accurately because it takes up a large volume per grain weight. However, most powder measure get it caught between the housing and the rotor. I had best luck just using dippers. It doesn't do anything Bullseye, Unique or WW231 does just as well for less money. IMHO, Ric

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Ed Harris
  • M3 Mitch
.22-10-45 posted this 05 January 2019

I have tried TB in some revolver ctgs...38 Spec., .44 & .45long Colt..so far accuracy not up to par with Bullseye or Tightgroup...but I need more work to be sure.  Where I really am sure is with an 1895 Winchester-Lee 6mm (.236 Lee-Navy) straight-pull sporting rifle.  I started out at 50yds on account of the open buckhorn rear & german silver blade front sights.  Using 10.0grs. H4227 gave 3/4" groups that shot to sights...however, case necks were left blackened.  Working up with TB, interestingly..10.0grs. also gave 3/4" groups with case necks left clean.  Moving back to 100yds, gave 11/4" groups.  I was using an Ideal #243498 100gr. mould and range-scrap alloy.  I plan on trying this powder in other rifles in the future.  When I opened the bottle of TB, I noticed grains were shaped like little doughnuts and a light gray color....I was instantly transported back to 1972 when my dad had found an old cardboard box in an abandoned house that was in a freeway right of way awaiting demolishing.  At the time, I didn't know what a .32-40 Winchester was..but those old cases were loaded with Ideal #31949,  and when I pulled one, out spilled a grayish colored powder with doughnut shaped grains...I re-inserted bullet and forgot about them until I opened that bottle of TB.  I called Hodgdon & told them my story...and asked if they hadn't re-introduced the old Lightning or Sharpshooter?  There was a very long silence..so long in fact I thought the tech. had rung off....Then he replied with a drawn out..".maybe."..but quickly added..."Ours is better!"  I told him that was pretty neat..history has come full circle in about 100 years.

Attached Files

onondaga posted this 05 January 2019

TrailBoss works. I stand against it because it is a fast pistol powder and lacks the relatively smooth pressure curve that cast bullets are most accurate with. It slams cast bullets with pressure and distorts accuracy potential. If you are shooting cast bullets well with TrailBoss, it is a surprise and not the reputation of the powder. 4198 does better as does H 4895 in their recommended loads, The H4895 is also recommended for reduced loads to 1/2 caseful down to 100 pound child recoil level gallery loads  and up to Elephant loads A very lightweight filler like BPI Original in reduced loads also protects the bullet base as well as a gas check and lowers Extreme Spread of velocity. Mildly compressed reduced loads with BPI Original also force H4895 to burn completely and leave no kernel trail in the bore. To me that makes the other choices garbage powder with no real advantage for cast bullets.

Plus if you need another reason to hate TrailBoss, just look at it. It looks like miniature racist Cheerios Cerialcoffee.

Gary

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
BigMan54 posted this 05 January 2019

I've got a 9oz "can" that I used to load 50rds of .44 Russian for a buddy from about 10yrs ago. It metered pretty easy in my Little Dandy. But My Friend felt different recoil levels in his Vaquero. I checked every 5th round. 

With a range of min-3.2grs to max-3.4grs, it doesn't give you much wiggle room. We never loaded another round with it.

But I'm thinking about trying some reduced loads in .45-70 & .38-55.

Long time Caster/Reloader, Getting back into it after almost 10yrs. Life Member NRA 40+yrs, Life S.A.S.S. #375. Does this mean a description of me as a fumble-fingered knuckle-draggin' baboon. I also drool in my sleep. I firmly believe that true happiness is a warm gun. Did I mention how much I HATE auto-correct on this blasted tablet.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
SavvyJack posted this 06 January 2019

Ken, for plinkers it is just fine.

I use it for my 44-40 plinkers because it fills the case enough to where a double charge would overflow. 

Accuracy is not important because I use it for my plinking loads.

Power is not important because I use it for my plinking loads

Velocity is not important because I use it for my plinking loads.

It is great for plinking loads because that is what it was designed for.

Cowboy Action Shooting is nothing more than plinking and who is was designed for!!

It is a fast burning pistol powder

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
Gregor posted this 06 January 2019

Bought some to try a light load in my .500 S&W Magnum revolver.  Poor accuracy and low velocity compared to the Unique loads.  

Attached Files

Scearcy posted this 06 January 2019

I tried Trail Boss in my 3006 during last springs Groundhog shoot. I don't think I will bother again. We have many proven powders that provide more flexibility. 

Attached Files

SavvyJack posted this 06 January 2019

Bought some to try a light load in my .500 S&W Magnum revolver.  Poor accuracy and low velocity compared to the Unique loads.  

 

Trailboss was designed for cowboy action shooting as a bulk powder. It was not designed for accuracy or velocity and is why it sucks when used in that application..

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • RicinYakima
  • M3 Mitch
SavvyJack posted this 06 January 2019

I tried Trail Boss in my 3006 during last springs Groundhog shoot. I don't think I will bother again. We have many proven powders that provide more flexibility. 

 

Trailboss was designed for cowboy action shooting as a bulk powder. It was not designed for accuracy or velocity and is why it sucks when used in that application..

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • RicinYakima
SavvyJack posted this 06 January 2019

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
max503 posted this 06 January 2019

Plus if you need another reason to hate TrailBoss, just look at it. It looks like miniature racist Cheerios Cerialcoffee.

Gary

******

Dude.  You just ain't right.dizzy    wink

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • onondaga
  • RicinYakima
OU812 posted this 06 January 2019

I briefly tried it in the 223 Remington, followed instructions by filling case to near maximum capacity. Velocity was lower than expected.

I wonder if compressed loads would work better. Maybe?

More powder, more fouling?

Needs more testing to rule out.

Attached Files

SavvyJack posted this 07 January 2019

I briefly tried it in the 223 Remington, followed instructions by filling case to near maximum capacity. Velocity was lower than expected. I wonder if compressed loads would work better. Maybe? More powder, more fouling? Needs more testing to rule out.

Trailboss was designed for cowboy action shooting as a bulk powder. It was not designed for accuracy or velocity and is why it sucks when used in that application..

Crush it and pressures will go out of the roof!!!

Attached Files

Scearcy posted this 07 January 2019

+1: Don't compress this stuff. It can get real ugly.

Attached Files

tony1960 posted this 07 January 2019

I will echo the "DO NOT COMPRESS" the pressure spike is wild. I have played with it in a 38SPL and what was a normal load slowly increasing, as soon as the powder got to capacity things got ugly, primers flattened and flowing. I think what everyone is saying is correct, if you are looking for a not so accurate load to play with then it fits the bill, just the fact that you need to be in a draught free zone is a pain as this stuff will just dissapear out of your pan. Velocities are also so-so, I would have liked to be able to predict that they would show some promise.

As an example 2.5 g of the following powders behind a 100gr SWC in my 38spl

Bullseye - 760 fps av
WST - 800 fps av
AS30 - 967 fps av (Clays)
TB - 739 fps av

 

all about the same group size with BE edging out AS30 to WST, TB brought up a woeful last. All out of 231 or that would have been in there too.

 

The powder may be OK for a rifle and the average person shooting some shopbought cast pills but not for what we are looking for.

 

Attached Files

SavvyJack posted this 07 January 2019

Trailboss was designed to be a plinking powder and nothing more.

Attached Files

Lee posted this 07 January 2019

"I briefly tried it in the 223 Remington, followed instructions by filling case to near maximum capacity. Velocity was lower than expected.

I wonder if compressed loads would work better. Maybe?

More powder, more fouling?"

So did I. With cast bullets. Did not work well.  Velocity way to slow accuracy poor. Can't get enough into the case without compressing it, and Trail Boss does not like to be compressed. I'll stick with Cowboy loads.

Attached Files

John Alexander posted this 07 January 2019

I tried Trail Boss with light CB loads in a 223 and got the lowest variation in muzzle velocity I have ever seen with any other powder both ES and SD, and I have chronographed a lot of loads.  However, I couldn't make it shoot nearly as well as other fast pistol powders or slower powders for that matter.  Something to think about for those who look for uniform MV in trying to find accuracy loads.

The arbitrary advice above that fast pistol powders are no good for reduced CB rifle loads flies in the face of decades of CB shooters finding the opposite.  I have been shooting such loads in CBA competition for thirty years and have no complaints.  

The logical sounding theory that the steep pressure curve distorts the CB is often used to support this belief -- not actual shooting trials.

Another theory might be that the higher initial pressure of fast powders upsets (expands) the soft bullet sooner forming a more perfect fit to the throat before it has traveled very far.

Both theories may be just BS since we don't know. But the actual successful performance of pistol powders (as well as medium fast rifle powders) we do know. The results can be seen in CBA match reports which  should be more convincing to anybody with an open mind than any theory -- no matter how logical the theory sounds.

What the powder maker intended the powder to be used for is entirely irrelevant to finding the best accuracy and shouldn't restrict the search for the best powder for your application.

John

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • R. Dupraz
Ed Harris posted this 07 January 2019

I'm with Ric.

I don't like fast-burning powders having a large particle size which I cannot measure within +/- 0.1 grain in small cases like the .32 ACP.

My all-time favorite is Bullseye.  Tied equally for second place are TiteGroup, 452AA and WST. Just as good.

Where I need a slower pistol powder than these, I found AutoComp measures uniformly and can use Unique data as a start load in most calibers for standard pressure (not +P) loads.    

Since I used the last of my #2400, I have been using IMR4227 as my "magnum" handgun powder.

All of these work in my handgun and mostly plainbased rifle loads from .32-20 to .44-40 and .30-'06.

When my current 1990 caddy of Bullseye is gone, I'll switch entirely over to a caddy of 452AA made about the same time, because it is approaching 30 years old, still good, but I want to shoot it tp rather than using it to fertilize Roma tomatoes, Roma II flat-pod green beans and red Serano peppers.

My remaining unopened 2008 Obama-panic-buy 8 lb. caddy of Bullseye will be the last to go if I live that long.

 

73 de KE4SKY In Home Mix We Trust From the Home of Ed's Red in "Almost Heaven" West Virginia

Attached Files

SavvyJack posted this 07 January 2019

Ed I am basically doing the same thing. I picked up 5 bottles of IMR-4227 about six years ago. I have shot up all my 2400, TiteGroup and good Black Powders. All I have left is one 1/2 bottle of Reloder 7, one 1/2 bottle of Unique and four bottles of 4227. 

For plinking I still have a good supply of Trail Boss from my CAS days.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • RicinYakima
Show More Posts
Close