Favorite Powder Measure?

  • 23K Views
  • Last Post 18 April 2010
Ron Brooks posted this 24 November 2006

So to get things moving on this forum, what is your favorite powder measure and for what applications?

 

To get things moving I like the RCBS Little Dandy for pistol powders. The Belding and Mull for harder to measure powders such aslarger extruded powders and the RCBS Uniflow for larger charges of rifle powder.

Ron

Attached Files

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
TonyT posted this 18 April 2010

I use an old Lyyman, an equally old Hollywood and a newer RCBS. I prefer the Lyman for light loads of flake powders, the Hollywood for IMR-4227 or XMP-5744 and the RSBS for the usual extruded powders.

Attached Files

Dew posted this 14 April 2010

Have a Lyman 55, RCBS with micro adjustment,Redding BR, Harrell Schuetzen, and last but not least AMT Electro. All work but I find I reach most for the RCBS with the verner and Redding with the verner. They are the quickest to reset. I leave the Harrell set on 13 Grains of Lil'Gun for my Hornet. Lyman is good but takes a bit of time to set so I leave it for 3.5 Bullseye and then throw other powders at that setting and make a list and stick it on the plastic tube. AMT is a pain to set up but does work OK. I've learned I can set any of the measures a bit short and use a Midway electric trickler to bring to correct weight faster than the AMT can do it's thing from scratch.

Attached Files

.22-10-45 posted this 28 March 2010

Hello, I like the Harrell,s schuetzen for small charges in .22,6mm,&.25. Have their larger benchrest model for .30-up. One cold rainy spring, made up charge cards with #cliks-charge weights for various powders. For revolver loads I like the Redding Match-grade with small drum. The Redding BR-30 very accurate also but won,t measure much below 10grs.

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 06 February 2010

Just to let folks know what I ended up doing, I just got a Lee powder thrower as was suggested here just to get started.  That is what I needed to do so I would know enough to see what I needed.  It actually works pretty well.  I can see I have been making too big a deal out of getting what is just exactly right.  I just needed to get something and start, then learn, then fine tune.

Thanks to all, really enjoying reloading and it has made shooting more fun. Joe

Attached Files

RicinYakima posted this 12 January 2010

Check your PM personal mail, on the home page. Ric

Attached Files

jkconner posted this 12 January 2010

a potter duplex reloader

Attached Files

jkconner posted this 12 January 2010

trying to find somthing on potter reloading press

Attached Files

Duane Mellenbruch posted this 21 December 2009

That would be my conclusion.  But it did point out that some thought should be given to wether the measure is to be used for pistol or rifle applications.  And this was a great opportunity for a person just getting started to have a lot of openions given about a variety of units and their strong or weak points.  Good information to have in the archives for the future.  Duane

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 21 December 2009

You know its sounding to me like most of the powder measures out there do a pretty decent job, you just have to do it the same every time. Is that accurate?

Attached Files

Brodie posted this 20 December 2009

I use the same old SAECO adjustable measure I baought back in the 1960"s.  I have used it for everything from 22 Hornet to 458 Winchester.  It has and continues to perform beautifully.  I have had to replace the powder reservoir with a pill bottle (large one. for a 3 month supply) a couple of years ago.  It just keeps on keeping on.

B.E.Brickey

Attached Files

Tazman1602 posted this 20 December 2009

Actually I've got three. When I reload for highly accurate loads I always use a Lee dipper and then dribble the powder on to a Dillon scale so that each and every charge has been weighed.

If I'm doing cast bullet “plinkers” I use a Lee Perfect Powder measure -- it actually throw pretty accurate charges when setup correctly and then if I want to load 500 pistol rounds I fire up the Dillon RL550B and use the Dillon powder dispenser. I've never had it be off, but I"m so paranoid about overcharging that I check about every tenth load on a scale..............

.............I reload for fun so I don't mind taking my time...especially this time of year.....

;}

 

Art

Attached Files

singleshot1 posted this 19 December 2009

Okjoek,

       I have and use an older Bonanza, works just fine. That said, I use it with the log type powders. As been said before, be very consistent in using what ever one you buy.:coffee Dave

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 16 December 2009

Has anyone used the Forster or Bonanza powder measure? I think they're press is the one I want and was wondering how the powder measure was as well.

Attached Files

Dale53 posted this 15 December 2009

I have a collection of powder measures. I think the “most for the buck” is the Redding Micrometer. They have several different types depending on your needs.

These days I mostly load pistol and revolver (a number of different calibers) and my Dillon 550B's with the NEW Dillon measures work extremely well.

I have several Lyman #55's (they are found in a number of places - rifle matches and gun shows - at near give away prices). One is tricked out for black powder use.

For “show and tell” I have a Harrell - it is VERY pretty and works as well as it looks.

I also have several Lee Pro disc powder measures and use them often - they work well for small charges of easily measured powder.

My favorite powder measure is a fancy naval bronze custom made for me and presented to me, complete with my name engraved on it, by the Great Gunsmith and BPCR Silhouette Champion, Glenn Fewless. THAT is my big rifle black powder measure complete with a naval bronze micrometer.

FWIW Dale53

Attached Files

raytear posted this 15 December 2009

POWDER MEASURE: I use the same Ohaus Duo-Measure that I purchased when I stated loading in the early '70's. It has both a large and a small measuring chamber built into the same drum. It was the best deal at the time because you did not have to buy another measuring chamber as with most other brands. (Ohaus built good stuff. All or part of their business was bought by RCBS quite a few years ago. I have an Ohaus scale, too. Seems like the measure & scale came as a set in a special deal.) It works great with spherical and finer grained powders, e.g., H-414 or RX-7. Is less consistent with log-like granules, e.g. IMR 4350, so I use(d) it with a trickler for precise or maximum loads in those cases.

ELECTRO-MECHANICAL POWDER MEASURE: I was given an AMT, now Lyman, (pre-digital) automatic powder measure. Just set the charge weight by adjusting the poises and mash the button. The correct charge is dispensed. In actual use, for large charges, I drop a short charge into the pan from the Ohaus, then mash the button----faster, and saves wear and tear on the rotating dispenser drive mechanism. Works great with stuff like IMR 4350, SR 4759, AA 5744; NOT GOOD for spherical or flake powders which tend to work their way into the dispenser tubes' bushings. FWIW.

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 15 December 2009

Wow, Ed, we left simple. It will be a while before I understand some of that but I like that there is so much to learn, keeps it interesting.

Attached Files

Ed Harris posted this 14 December 2009

On .38 Special and .45 ACP for production loading nothing is better than the Dillon measure. But to get uniform charges you need to be consistent in your manuipulation of the loading machine. Mixed brass causes more variation in machine effort and vibration and increases charge variability.

When loading .38 Special wadcutter ammo we use only brass sorted by headstamp which came from factory wadcutter loads, or plain unplated brass cases of the same make without any cannelures on the case body. This is because +P and service load brass has a heavier sidewall to achieve higher bullet pull with jacketed bullets and often has a heavy cannelure rolled close to the case mouth.

These conditions increase bullet base deformation in seating and profiling and also require more effort in case sizing, expanding and profiling assembled rounds.

For practice ammo with cast Saeco #348 DEWC bullets we do all case sizing and priming on the machine, starting with tumble-cleaned, sorted fired brass. For match ammo loaded with the Remington factory 148-gr. HBWC bullets we decap once-fired brass, then tumble in clean cornbob, deburr, prime and lightly flare, then load-assemble crimp on the Dillon using the Lee Factory Crimp Die on the final stage.

Properly assembled wadcutters using the Remington bullets shoot as well at 50 yards as the best lots of factory ammo, about 1-1/2” and cast DEWCs will stay under 2 inches at 50 for long series of 5-shot groups.

In the .45 ACP we use generally the same loading methods. Every setup we weigh ten charges, and during a session we weigh another ten every time we stop to refill the case feeder or powder measure. Using Alliant Bullseye the variation in check weights is minimal, and the proof of the pudding is that the ammo shoots well. Our shooting group loads about 50,000 rounds of ammo a year on two RL550Bs.  We buy four 8-lb. caddies of Bullseye approximately annually and have been doing so for over ten years.  Nothing is going to convince any of these guys to change powders or loading methods.

I cast bullets for the group using a pair of 20-lb. Ohio Thermal bottom-pour pots and alternating pairs of Saeco or H&G 4-cavity gang moulds.   Current production is using “backstop scrap” from the indoor range we use which is owned by ARES Security here in the DC area.  The range is used mostly by DoD contract security, military and law enforcement, but Virginia CCW permit holders may obtain an annual membership which enables them to use the range evenings, weekends and non-duty hours. 

The composition of salvaged lead is influenced by a preponderance of 9mm, .40 and .45 ACP being fired on the range, with a smattering of .38 Special and other deposited by the civilians.  Enough commercial hardcast is sprinkled into the mix that the ingots from periodic renderings cast and act like wheelweights with enough tin in the mix to cast slightly frosted, uniformly filled out bullets of 11-12 BHN.  I haven't needed to add any supplemental tin for several years, so life is good.   I get the lead  free and sell skimmed off jacket material to pay for propane to fire the plumbers pot.

 

73 de KE4SKY In Home Mix We Trust From the Home of Ed's Red in "Almost Heaven" West Virginia

Attached Files

Fred Sinclair posted this 14 December 2009

okjoek wrote: I know it never ends but also, does everyone here prefer the mechanical over the digital powder machines?  I think I would rather the mechanical ones, but are they better, faster or whatever than the electronic ones?

I use a RCBS 750 mainly because it is quicker than a mechanical when weighing bullets. For occasional charge weighing or bullet sorting a lesser price balance beam will get you by. I also have a RCBS Dial-O-Grain 3 beam which is very accurate but it is to big and bulky for the loading bench. The majority of the handloader scales out there have that +/- .10 accuracy so from the accuracy standpoint a $20 one has the same accuracy as a $300 one. When the budget is tight spend less spent on the scale and means more to spend on the measure.

I see Midway has some low buck electronic scales, anybody here tried these?

Attached Files

Fred Sinclair posted this 14 December 2009

okjoek wrote: Back to the simple questions, What is the difference in throwing powder for a rifle and a pistol.  Why do people use and like different measures for each? The smaller volume of the pistol charges are not best served by the large capiticy rifle inserts. If you are only going to do the 45acp maybe the Lee Dippers. You can even make your own dippers by altereing a couple of your 9mm cases. However, I'm not a pistol shooter so I may be all wet. There are a lot of pistol shooters on this fourm including Ed the Master. Chime in here guys. What should okjoek do about measuring powder for his 45acp?

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 14 December 2009

I know it never ends but also, does everyone here prefer the mechanical over the digital powder machines?  I think I would rather the mechanical ones, but are they better, faster or whatever than the electronic ones?

Attached Files

Show More Posts
Close