Favorite Powder Measure?

  • 23K Views
  • Last Post 18 April 2010
Ron Brooks posted this 24 November 2006

So to get things moving on this forum, what is your favorite powder measure and for what applications?

 

To get things moving I like the RCBS Little Dandy for pistol powders. The Belding and Mull for harder to measure powders such aslarger extruded powders and the RCBS Uniflow for larger charges of rifle powder.

Ron

Attached Files

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
CB posted this 24 November 2006

Hi Ron It sounds like we both use about the same equipment for the same reasons.

I have my uniflows (2) modified to use the sinclair bottle adapter and have sinclair drop tubes on them as well.

I sure would like to figger out a way to do that with my little dandy though. Sure would make that easier and have a larger powder capacity.

My Belding and Mull sits in the drawer for the most part, I try not to use those large grain extruded powders much, but for the wifes 270 using 4831 I do use it but still trickle the charge to exact with a scale.

Attached Files

John B posted this 24 November 2006

Well, gents, I use the Belding & Mull for bottlenecked cases and full charges. I use the Lee Dippers for light and moderate charges and for short runs ~15 to 20 cases. I use the Lee Auto-Disk for pistol cases on the Lee Load Master where it does as good a job as the Belding & Mull as far as consistency is concerned. A gent at a gun show gave me a ?Redding? sliding-bar measure similar to but larger than the RCBS Little Dandy but so far I haven't had a load that matched the available bushings. It ought to be real fast at charging pistol cases. Best regards John

Attached Files

Ron Brooks posted this 24 November 2006

Jeff,

Tell me about the Sinclair bottle adapters, I've never heard of them before. I also have a RCBS Duo Flow I picked up used that needs a bottle, would one work on it? I need to try a uniflow botttle on it. I was quite disheartened to learn that RCBS no longer makes or even carries parts for these.

John,

I forgot about the Lee dippers. I have both the old and new sets of those, although I haven't used them for a time. I used to have some tippers I made up with wire handles and empty pistol cases, 380, 9mm, and 32 auto. I gave them to my nephew years ago.

Ron

 

Attached Files

CB posted this 24 November 2006

The sinclair adapter allows either the bottles they sell or a standard Hodgdon 1 lb bottle to screw onto the measure. You can see them online at:

http://www.sinclairintl.com/cgi-bin/category.cgi?category=REPMSP&type=store

Look for part number PM-9000

Also needed will be a drop tube lit for a RCBS powder measure.

After removing the plastic cylinder from the RCBS, I drilled 3 holes at 0,90 and 180 degrees and tapped for a 10-24 screw to attach the adapter to the measure.

Sinclair is a bad place, too many nice tools I can't live without, of which all are not cheap, but they are very good!

Attached Files

John Boy posted this 25 November 2006

Ideal No 5 ... for BPCR Dillon 550B ... for mass loading of cartridge BP and the white stuff MEC 650  ...  for  shotgun shells Old Herter's ML 64 ... for bismuth BP waterfowl loads Lee Perfect Powder Measure ... for white powder rifle loads ... I've found all these measures to be accurate for the specific load types

B&M ... has been sitting under the bench for a long time.  Accurate, but the lever deal is a pain

And when the mood stricks me, the Ohaus Du-O measure is very accuracte for both black and white powders.

Regards John

Attached Files

Ron Brooks posted this 27 November 2006

Jeff,

Thanks, I'm looking into the Sinclair adapter. Neat site.

Thanks,

Ron

Attached Files

steveb posted this 27 November 2006

I use the Lee Pro Auto Disk for the 357Mag, 44Mag. Just starting to reload for the 45/70 so we'll see how it does with that cartridge. The Lee Pro auto disk used in conjunction with the Lee powder through expander dies Rock-N-Rolls!;}

Attached Files

CB posted this 28 November 2006

After doing the powder measure test and writing the article, my favorite powder measure was the Belding and Mull.

I can't use it with the spring, I don't get the spring?? Without the spring it did everything right, and I felt that it might be/probably was the most repeatable measure tested-less one outlier.

So I bought 3, planning to have a traveler and 2 bench mounted.

I've managed to acquire a tremor that makes it impossible for me to use the measures in a reasonable fashion without throwing powder all over the place. During the test I had a big funnel over/in the scale pan, held that under the measure and charge tube, and dumped the charge tube immediately into the funnel then pan.

So I sold one and am selling the other two; maybe I'll just keep on with the 55s. But I still think the B&M is maybe best of all tested. Look at the article.

joe b. 

 joe brennan

Attached Files

CB posted this 29 November 2006

Joe Which article and where is it located?

Attached Files

CB posted this 29 November 2006

Jeff Bowles wrote: Joe Which article and where is it located? 6.4.1 THE ASTOUNDING POWDER MEASURE TEST!

Attached Files

Ron Brooks posted this 02 December 2006

So, I am correct in thinking that it was the brass hoppers, then luminum, then plastic on the Belding and Mulls?

Ron

Attached Files

sundog posted this 03 December 2006

Lee Perfect Powder Measure.  Easy and fast to adjust and holds consistent  volume.  Good for everything except the finest ball powders like H108 which leak past the drum.  sundog

Attached Files

pistolfan posted this 03 December 2006

The RCBS Uniflow has served me well for some 30+ years. It is accurate as long as I do my part for each case. I did do one change to it, a few years ago someone wrote in ” The Fouling Shot” about putting a drain tube in this measure. I put a 1/4 ” brass pipe and nipple in the side of my measure and it works great for emptying the powder out without having to take it off the bench. Peter aka pistolfan

Attached Files

Ross posted this 04 December 2006

"...brass hoppers, then luminum, then plastic on the Belding and Mulls?..."

Ron,

The order is correct, I believe, but the brass was returned until recently introduced plastic, and may still be available.

I find my aluminum hoppers are subject to corrosion.

I suspect that plastic was introduced to allow the amount of powder remaining to be seen, but it removes a major cool factor, and adds an annoying static cling.

Easing the return spring sure helps.

The reservoir cover is an automotive soft plug/ freeze plug, and is cheaper at your auto supply store than from the maker. 

Cheers from Darkest California,

Ross

Attached Files

Ed Harris posted this 21 December 2006

I use two micrometer conversions of the Lyman No. 55 body which were made in the 1970s by the late Homer Culver. These have bottle conversions also. The pistol measure reservoir is nice for assembling rifle gallery loads with pistol powder. It is graduated with 20 detented clicks and ten hashed graduations per revolution, with each graduation displacing 0.1 grain of W-W231, and almost exactly 1 grain per revolution. With W-W 231 displacing 0.99 grams/cc it is easy to estimate the initial setting to check charge weight, because 50 clicks on the vernier scale is really, really close to 5.0 grains.  With Bullseye at 0.85g/cc the same 50 clicks give you 4.3 grains. I have found that with current Alliant Bullseye I can use the same volumentric measure setting that I did with the load “that worked” with 231 and it is a great place to start from with Bullseye.  The measure settings are remarkably repeatable, but you still may need to make +/- a click adjustments to compensate for seasonal atmospheric changes in relative humidity to get dead on. 

I drop ten charges onto the electronic scale, weigh the the aggregate, move the decimal and tweak the measure setting +/- a click or so and repeat as needed. In a trial or two soon soon will have it dead on zero. The Culver pistol measure is the only measure I've seen which accurately measures small charges of Bullseye as light as 1.5 grains for the .32s without having to weigh every one and trickle them.

The Culver rifle measure has a larger reservoir and was optimized for throwing H322 for the PPC series of benchrest cartridges. Its reservoir adjusts up to a maximum of about 70 grains of RL-15, 4064, 4350 or 4831 and will do so within +/- 0.2 grain which is quite accurate enough assembling service rifle ammo for highpower competition or hunting loads up to .300 Mag. Nobody today makes a powder measure like Homer did. Neil Jones has tried and has come close, but there isn't enough money to talk me out of either Culver I have.

73 de KE4SKY In Home Mix We Trust From the Home of Ed's Red in "Almost Heaven" West Virginia

Attached Files

guido4198 posted this 24 December 2006

My absolute favorite powder measure is the Lyman 55 I inherited from my father. While it may not offer the technical advantages of some that have been mentioned previously...this one does have a singular advantage which none others possess.

This one is the tool my Dad taught me to use when I helped him cast, lube, and load...when Eisenhower was President, I hadn't learned about girls yet, and things were good.

I still use it, and everytime the little “knocker” on the front bounces up and down...well, the sound takes me back.

THAT is my favorite powder measure.

Merry Christmas...!!!

Don

Attached Files

PETE posted this 25 December 2006

I actually have three powder measures I like, depending on the application.

The one I use the most is for Schuetzen shooting and that's a Harrel Schuetzen model. Extremely accurate for the small charges of smokeless we use.

For “regular” at home loading and at the bench black powder shooting I like the Redding 3BR. Again, extremely accurate. It does have a problem with 1F black. But you can say that with most measures.

For those “chunky” powders like 1F black and 4759 I use a B&M.

All three measures will throw within a .1 gr. and most of the time exactly what's wanted. This, in my opinion, is imperative since I load most of my ammo at the bench during a match.

PETE

Attached Files

BruceV posted this 04 January 2007

Since 1982 I have used a RCBS Uniflow Powder Measure for reloading both rifle and handgun rounds.  When the Little Dandy came out, I bought one along with a number of the rotors.  I have found it to work well for loading handgun rounds and think it may likely have some application to CB rifle loads.  I will have to look into it.  JMHO.  Sincerely.  Bruce.

Attached Files

RussMillar posted this 04 November 2007

My favorite measure is a Potter rotary measure I bought in 1960 as part of a Potter Duplex reloading press. It has three different sized adjustable brass rotors that change out quickly without changing adjustments. The measure mounts on a shaft and is operated with each use of the press handle. Undo the wing on the end of the shaft, slide off the measure and quickly change powders. It never binds and is very smooth in operation.

Attached Files

George4741 posted this 05 November 2007

The Ohaus Duo-Measure. It's the only one I've ever had/used.

Attached Files

CB posted this 05 November 2007

I use a Redding micrometer I bought used back in 1984 and it works fine. No complaints. I also have a used Ohaus but it is a little harder to adjust with its linkage instead of a micrometer.

I helped a new reloader set up his new Lee Reloading Kit a few years ago and was absolutely amazed at the plastic Lee Perfect Powder measure. It threw a perfect charge of IMR 3031 everytime, while telling the guy he was probably going to have to weigh every charge! :(  Ha!   I was always going to buy one but never did.

My prairie dog buddy bought a Harrell for jacketed BR competition. It isn't any better than his Lee Perfect Powder measure, but now he is in a different world where powder charges are called 'clicks' . He doesn't know what a powder scale is anymore.....................Dan

Woooops! Almost forgot. I learned to reload on a Belding &Mull and had used it for the first 15 years for IMR powders. It is a great little throwder, but I don't use it much anymore.

 

Attached Files

Ed Harris posted this 05 November 2007

The Harrell is supposed to be a copy of the Culver, which I have. If Fred Sinclair is still as much a perfectionist as I remember, he would only sell the best They do make a Scheutzen or pistol version of this measure also. I wouldn't sell my original Culver pistol measure (one of ten he ever built) for all the tea in China.

73 de KE4SKY In Home Mix We Trust From the Home of Ed's Red in "Almost Heaven" West Virginia

Attached Files

linoww posted this 06 November 2007

I have a goofy Pacific measure that works like a Belding and Mull (sort of) You swing the resovoir over the charge tube much like the Mull and then use the funnel that is part of the base to charge the case.It works pretty nice for 4759 and the course powders and is quite fast to use.Wormanship not so spectacular but an interesting measure that throws uniform charges.I'd like to have another.

 

geo.

"if it was easy we'd let women do it" don't tell my wife I said that!

Attached Files

3sixbits posted this 06 November 2007

I know I've got over a dozen and should sell them, cause I only use one and that is the Harrell. I've got the and old Lyman 55, I bought new in he early sixities for 16.00 bucks, my first. Times they do change.

Attached Files

CB posted this 23 November 2007

I use the Dillon powders measures on my Dillon presses. I do have a Belding Mull measure that I like for those special loads.

My question is what are the best scales for doing the measures. I have a digital at the moment, but I can't find my RCBS beam type of scles. So I will probably buy another one when I find one at the right price.

Jerry

Attached Files

Russ posted this 24 November 2007

I have used a Bullseye pistol powder measure for more than 30 years. Was marketed by Bonanza but has been discontinued for probably 15 years. It preceded the RCBS and is handier to use, also as with all things “green” the bonanza was cheaper. I watch for them in 2nd hand stores, pawn shops and gun shows.

Attached Files

CB posted this 24 November 2007

I love my Harrell, really like my Redding, and have a fond attachment for my RCBS. If I had to choose only one for all my shooting it'd be the Redding 3BR with a bottle attachment and drop tube but thank God I don't because the Harrel's a gem.

Saying a Harrell isn't any better than a Lee is a real stretch.

Attached Files

CB posted this 18 July 2009

Powder Throwers

I have many, been doing the reloading thing for 47 years. I shoot NBRSA BR and now use a Bruno almost all the time. The Bruno has the Culver system of click adjustments and  takes the the wide mouth powder bottles using the Sinclair type bottle adaptor. I won't tell you the price might scare some.

Getting back to affordable throwers I feel the best one and the one that gave me the most service is the Redding. Most accurate and repeats as well as you can read the micrometer adjustment.

I also have a Lyman/Culver, Jones/Culver, RCBS Uniflo, RCBS Lil Dandy, Lyman 55, Belding & Mull, Hollywood and Lee Dippers.

To me powder throwers all do the same thing. Working on the gravity feed principle the difference I see in throwers is in the adjustments. The best treatise I have read on powder throwers was done by Phil Sharpe in his book The Complete Guide To Handloading.

Powder throwers take practice and patience. Make the effort.

Srephen Perry

Angeles BR:fire

Attached Files

cityboy posted this 18 July 2009

I have used the Redding Model 3 combo for years and like it so much my RCBS is collecting dust.

Jim

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 13 December 2009

Hello, I'm new here and to reloading, just looking to start loading for rifles, have loaded for shotguns for years.  I am interested in powder measures and have a couple of questions: do people prefer the mechanical over the electronic? Also was wondering about the Redding I see they have a 3 and then a match grade, was wondering what the difference is.  I want an accurate one but without unlimited funds for this, have son in college, I need to get one that is very good, but without perhaps paying a lot more for one thats maybe just a little bit better.

Attached Files

Fred Sinclair posted this 13 December 2009

Speaking strickly from a dollar standpoint;

Lee Perfect $25

RCBS Uniflow $75-140

Harrell  $180- up

They all do the same thing if you do your part. If you don't get a measure with a micrometer adjustment you should have a scale to help adjust the thing.

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 13 December 2009

By not listing the Redding do you mean you don't like that particular brand? In the three you did list, do they match up about like you would think from stickly a dollar standpoint as far as how long they will last and how accurate load they will throw?

Attached Files

Fred Sinclair posted this 13 December 2009

I prefer the RCBS, over the Redding, mainly because the adjustment is on the front side. Both will are measures that will last a lifetime. You didn't say but if you are loading pistol and rifle you will need both large and small inserts.

The Lee looks like it came out of a Cracker Jack box, is a bit awkward to use but is amazingly accurate. It is $25 dollars worth. Make anyone a starter measure. You could go that route and then tell your son, when he graduates, “Boy I sure would like a Harrell for xmas".

Attached Files

hunterspistol posted this 13 December 2009

     I just started setting up in the last ten years, so only have one measure. It's the Redding Model 3 with both micrometers.  I bought the entire set for around $105.  I like following it with a trickler, to make all my charges consistent.  I've used my friends Lyman 55, wouldn't mind having one.  The Redding Model 3 is fine for all my uses, the 3BR would be the creme de la creme but, dollarwise, I opted for both rifle and pistol mics as a set.  I doubt there's a single thing wrong with RCBS measures but, the Redding is just nicely made and more metal. I like products made of cast iron, they just seem more stately to me.

  Ron

Attached Files

CB posted this 13 December 2009

I like your thinking here Fred! I have several RCBS Uniflow measures and I also have one of the Lee Measures. The Lee is very accurate using flake or ball powders, but is miserable when using extruded stick powders. Harrell's are undoubtedly the finest powder measure made. You can see the quality, simple detented clicks made adjustment a breeze. Very repeatable and it just looks good!

Attached Files

Fred Sinclair posted this 13 December 2009

Around 30 years ago I made custom measures with Homer Culver style inserts. Kinda' like today's Harrell. I do not recall what it sold for but it wasn't cheap. Redding came out with their 3BR. It had a retail around $60-70. As Redding dealers they sent me one to check out. Well of coarse I had to set it up along side of my super Sinclair none better measure to prove how good my measure was. Long story short, I quit making mine and ordered a supply of the 3BR. No BS, true story.

Over the years I have tested and compared a lot of powder measures and when the user develops a smooth consistent rhythm of operation they all work. Get in a hurry, jerk that lever, vary the rhythm and you will not get consistent charges.                      

If you weigh the charge to check the accuracy of the measure keep in mind that most handloading scales have a plus or minus .1 grain tolerance. In the real world that means a 2 tenths variance in your charge could be in your scale.

I personally, am quite comfortable charging cases directly out of the powder measure. Just be smooth and consistent when operating the handle. Sometime sit down with your measure and scale and try different operating methods, it will pay off.

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 13 December 2009

I am planning on loading .308, 6.5x55, and 30-30 for rifle, and would also like to load .45ACP and maybe 9mm, and 380. Don't care as much about loading the last two pistol loads.
I feel funny asking such simple questions from those here who know so much I do appreciate the patience you've shown.

Attached Files

Fred Sinclair posted this 13 December 2009

Hey, ask simple questions, we got simple answers. We'll be off line on the hard ones.

Attached Files

Dennis Jorgensen posted this 13 December 2009

2 Dillons with my 550, and I still wonder why the pot metal looking things work so well. A Redding I have had for ever. I seem to inherit lyman 55's so 3 are set for a specfic load. 2 sets of Lee dippers that I use a lot for smaller runs.

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 14 December 2009

Back to the simple questions, What is the difference in throwing powder for a rifle and a pistol.  Why do people use and like different measures for each?

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 14 December 2009

I know it never ends but also, does everyone here prefer the mechanical over the digital powder machines?  I think I would rather the mechanical ones, but are they better, faster or whatever than the electronic ones?

Attached Files

Fred Sinclair posted this 14 December 2009

okjoek wrote: Back to the simple questions, What is the difference in throwing powder for a rifle and a pistol.  Why do people use and like different measures for each? The smaller volume of the pistol charges are not best served by the large capiticy rifle inserts. If you are only going to do the 45acp maybe the Lee Dippers. You can even make your own dippers by altereing a couple of your 9mm cases. However, I'm not a pistol shooter so I may be all wet. There are a lot of pistol shooters on this fourm including Ed the Master. Chime in here guys. What should okjoek do about measuring powder for his 45acp?

Attached Files

Fred Sinclair posted this 14 December 2009

okjoek wrote: I know it never ends but also, does everyone here prefer the mechanical over the digital powder machines?  I think I would rather the mechanical ones, but are they better, faster or whatever than the electronic ones?

I use a RCBS 750 mainly because it is quicker than a mechanical when weighing bullets. For occasional charge weighing or bullet sorting a lesser price balance beam will get you by. I also have a RCBS Dial-O-Grain 3 beam which is very accurate but it is to big and bulky for the loading bench. The majority of the handloader scales out there have that +/- .10 accuracy so from the accuracy standpoint a $20 one has the same accuracy as a $300 one. When the budget is tight spend less spent on the scale and means more to spend on the measure.

I see Midway has some low buck electronic scales, anybody here tried these?

Attached Files

Ed Harris posted this 14 December 2009

On .38 Special and .45 ACP for production loading nothing is better than the Dillon measure. But to get uniform charges you need to be consistent in your manuipulation of the loading machine. Mixed brass causes more variation in machine effort and vibration and increases charge variability.

When loading .38 Special wadcutter ammo we use only brass sorted by headstamp which came from factory wadcutter loads, or plain unplated brass cases of the same make without any cannelures on the case body. This is because +P and service load brass has a heavier sidewall to achieve higher bullet pull with jacketed bullets and often has a heavy cannelure rolled close to the case mouth.

These conditions increase bullet base deformation in seating and profiling and also require more effort in case sizing, expanding and profiling assembled rounds.

For practice ammo with cast Saeco #348 DEWC bullets we do all case sizing and priming on the machine, starting with tumble-cleaned, sorted fired brass. For match ammo loaded with the Remington factory 148-gr. HBWC bullets we decap once-fired brass, then tumble in clean cornbob, deburr, prime and lightly flare, then load-assemble crimp on the Dillon using the Lee Factory Crimp Die on the final stage.

Properly assembled wadcutters using the Remington bullets shoot as well at 50 yards as the best lots of factory ammo, about 1-1/2” and cast DEWCs will stay under 2 inches at 50 for long series of 5-shot groups.

In the .45 ACP we use generally the same loading methods. Every setup we weigh ten charges, and during a session we weigh another ten every time we stop to refill the case feeder or powder measure. Using Alliant Bullseye the variation in check weights is minimal, and the proof of the pudding is that the ammo shoots well. Our shooting group loads about 50,000 rounds of ammo a year on two RL550Bs.  We buy four 8-lb. caddies of Bullseye approximately annually and have been doing so for over ten years.  Nothing is going to convince any of these guys to change powders or loading methods.

I cast bullets for the group using a pair of 20-lb. Ohio Thermal bottom-pour pots and alternating pairs of Saeco or H&G 4-cavity gang moulds.   Current production is using “backstop scrap” from the indoor range we use which is owned by ARES Security here in the DC area.  The range is used mostly by DoD contract security, military and law enforcement, but Virginia CCW permit holders may obtain an annual membership which enables them to use the range evenings, weekends and non-duty hours. 

The composition of salvaged lead is influenced by a preponderance of 9mm, .40 and .45 ACP being fired on the range, with a smattering of .38 Special and other deposited by the civilians.  Enough commercial hardcast is sprinkled into the mix that the ingots from periodic renderings cast and act like wheelweights with enough tin in the mix to cast slightly frosted, uniformly filled out bullets of 11-12 BHN.  I haven't needed to add any supplemental tin for several years, so life is good.   I get the lead  free and sell skimmed off jacket material to pay for propane to fire the plumbers pot.

 

73 de KE4SKY In Home Mix We Trust From the Home of Ed's Red in "Almost Heaven" West Virginia

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 15 December 2009

Wow, Ed, we left simple. It will be a while before I understand some of that but I like that there is so much to learn, keeps it interesting.

Attached Files

raytear posted this 15 December 2009

POWDER MEASURE: I use the same Ohaus Duo-Measure that I purchased when I stated loading in the early '70's. It has both a large and a small measuring chamber built into the same drum. It was the best deal at the time because you did not have to buy another measuring chamber as with most other brands. (Ohaus built good stuff. All or part of their business was bought by RCBS quite a few years ago. I have an Ohaus scale, too. Seems like the measure & scale came as a set in a special deal.) It works great with spherical and finer grained powders, e.g., H-414 or RX-7. Is less consistent with log-like granules, e.g. IMR 4350, so I use(d) it with a trickler for precise or maximum loads in those cases.

ELECTRO-MECHANICAL POWDER MEASURE: I was given an AMT, now Lyman, (pre-digital) automatic powder measure. Just set the charge weight by adjusting the poises and mash the button. The correct charge is dispensed. In actual use, for large charges, I drop a short charge into the pan from the Ohaus, then mash the button----faster, and saves wear and tear on the rotating dispenser drive mechanism. Works great with stuff like IMR 4350, SR 4759, AA 5744; NOT GOOD for spherical or flake powders which tend to work their way into the dispenser tubes' bushings. FWIW.

Attached Files

Dale53 posted this 15 December 2009

I have a collection of powder measures. I think the “most for the buck” is the Redding Micrometer. They have several different types depending on your needs.

These days I mostly load pistol and revolver (a number of different calibers) and my Dillon 550B's with the NEW Dillon measures work extremely well.

I have several Lyman #55's (they are found in a number of places - rifle matches and gun shows - at near give away prices). One is tricked out for black powder use.

For “show and tell” I have a Harrell - it is VERY pretty and works as well as it looks.

I also have several Lee Pro disc powder measures and use them often - they work well for small charges of easily measured powder.

My favorite powder measure is a fancy naval bronze custom made for me and presented to me, complete with my name engraved on it, by the Great Gunsmith and BPCR Silhouette Champion, Glenn Fewless. THAT is my big rifle black powder measure complete with a naval bronze micrometer.

FWIW Dale53

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 16 December 2009

Has anyone used the Forster or Bonanza powder measure? I think they're press is the one I want and was wondering how the powder measure was as well.

Attached Files

singleshot1 posted this 19 December 2009

Okjoek,

       I have and use an older Bonanza, works just fine. That said, I use it with the log type powders. As been said before, be very consistent in using what ever one you buy.:coffee Dave

Attached Files

Tazman1602 posted this 20 December 2009

Actually I've got three. When I reload for highly accurate loads I always use a Lee dipper and then dribble the powder on to a Dillon scale so that each and every charge has been weighed.

If I'm doing cast bullet “plinkers” I use a Lee Perfect Powder measure -- it actually throw pretty accurate charges when setup correctly and then if I want to load 500 pistol rounds I fire up the Dillon RL550B and use the Dillon powder dispenser. I've never had it be off, but I"m so paranoid about overcharging that I check about every tenth load on a scale..............

.............I reload for fun so I don't mind taking my time...especially this time of year.....

;}

 

Art

Attached Files

Brodie posted this 20 December 2009

I use the same old SAECO adjustable measure I baought back in the 1960"s.  I have used it for everything from 22 Hornet to 458 Winchester.  It has and continues to perform beautifully.  I have had to replace the powder reservoir with a pill bottle (large one. for a 3 month supply) a couple of years ago.  It just keeps on keeping on.

B.E.Brickey

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 21 December 2009

You know its sounding to me like most of the powder measures out there do a pretty decent job, you just have to do it the same every time. Is that accurate?

Attached Files

Duane Mellenbruch posted this 21 December 2009

That would be my conclusion.  But it did point out that some thought should be given to wether the measure is to be used for pistol or rifle applications.  And this was a great opportunity for a person just getting started to have a lot of openions given about a variety of units and their strong or weak points.  Good information to have in the archives for the future.  Duane

Attached Files

jkconner posted this 12 January 2010

trying to find somthing on potter reloading press

Attached Files

jkconner posted this 12 January 2010

a potter duplex reloader

Attached Files

RicinYakima posted this 12 January 2010

Check your PM personal mail, on the home page. Ric

Attached Files

okjoek posted this 06 February 2010

Just to let folks know what I ended up doing, I just got a Lee powder thrower as was suggested here just to get started.  That is what I needed to do so I would know enough to see what I needed.  It actually works pretty well.  I can see I have been making too big a deal out of getting what is just exactly right.  I just needed to get something and start, then learn, then fine tune.

Thanks to all, really enjoying reloading and it has made shooting more fun. Joe

Attached Files

.22-10-45 posted this 28 March 2010

Hello, I like the Harrell,s schuetzen for small charges in .22,6mm,&.25. Have their larger benchrest model for .30-up. One cold rainy spring, made up charge cards with #cliks-charge weights for various powders. For revolver loads I like the Redding Match-grade with small drum. The Redding BR-30 very accurate also but won,t measure much below 10grs.

Attached Files

Dew posted this 14 April 2010

Have a Lyman 55, RCBS with micro adjustment,Redding BR, Harrell Schuetzen, and last but not least AMT Electro. All work but I find I reach most for the RCBS with the verner and Redding with the verner. They are the quickest to reset. I leave the Harrell set on 13 Grains of Lil'Gun for my Hornet. Lyman is good but takes a bit of time to set so I leave it for 3.5 Bullseye and then throw other powders at that setting and make a list and stick it on the plastic tube. AMT is a pain to set up but does work OK. I've learned I can set any of the measures a bit short and use a Midway electric trickler to bring to correct weight faster than the AMT can do it's thing from scratch.

Attached Files

TonyT posted this 18 April 2010

I use an old Lyyman, an equally old Hollywood and a newer RCBS. I prefer the Lyman for light loads of flake powders, the Hollywood for IMR-4227 or XMP-5744 and the RSBS for the usual extruded powders.

Attached Files

Close