96 Swede 6.5x55

  • 2.6K Views
  • Last Post 05 June 2019
R. Dupraz posted this 24 April 2018

Made the mistake of going to the range yesterday. A fellow club member who was down the line a ways gives me a wave so down I go. He had just finished shooting a nicely sporterized an scoped  Carl Gustave 96 Swedish 6.5x55 Mauser at 100 and had to show me his 1" three shot groups with jacketed.  

The short version is that the rifle along with brass, bullets, dies and ultimately a new in the cosmoline wrapper 1903 Springfield Remington barrel dated 4-43 now have a new home. After some brushing and patching, the bore in that 96 looks very good. . 

So. has anyone gotten these rifles to shoot respectable groups with cast. I have always heard that it is a challenge because of the long throat in these things? Haven't measured the twist yet. 

 

Attached Files

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
jchiggins posted this 24 April 2018

I'm working on loads for a M38 at this time.  The twist is 1 in 7.8", so it is fast.  Starting to see results using the Lee Cruise Missle 170gr gc.  Started with Trail Boss, then went to A2400 and things improved...... but now am using H4895, which I think will be the ticket.  I hope to have it settled in soon: am going to the range tomorrow to test.  I'll let you know the results and corresponding load. I imagine there is a lot of experience with these rifles on the forum.  I have a M96 set up with an aperature sight, but my eyes aren't up to the job, so I put a scout scope on the M38.

Jud

Attached Files

Ken Campbell Iowa posted this 25 April 2018

good question .... been wondering that myself ... i do notice that no body seems to be in the top half at any military matches with one ..... and i been watching for 15 years or so .....

i am planning to shoot mine in the groundhog shoot as soon as i get a scope mounted ...

back in '92 i bot 3 of m38 and a couple new surplus m38 barrels ( in the white ) ... naturally i traded off the rifles after a little plinking ...  but now have another m38 and still have the new barrels .... i bore-scoped the new barrels and the rifling is extremely good and smooth ... the shoulder of the chambers are very rough, as though the reamer bounced ?? ... but doubt that would affect accuracy .

i might mention that i also acquired a strange mismatched sporterized and mistreated 96 type rifle imported and in 7.62 x 63, which ( i think ) is a 30-06 ... the action is marked * vapen-depoten  falun *  and the bolt is turned down .....   i want to rebarrel this rifle, and the stock is cracked ... just thought it interesting.  should be a fun project.

ken

 

Attached Files

RicinYakima posted this 25 April 2018

RD, Joe G. and I bought several of these also in the early '90's when they were $49.99 from SOG. We had Walt at NEI make us a mould, he had the cherry, that was a copy of the military RN 160 grain at .266" nose diameter and lots of lube grooves. Basically it just filled up the 14 foot long throat. It would shoot 1 1/2" with Unique cast from linotype, or H4895 from WW's. Nice round groups, but nothing small up to about 1300 f/s. After that, faster equals bigger. FWIW, all with tried with Hornady 160 grains RN jacketed would shoot as good as we could see at 100 with issue sights. Ric

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
jchiggins posted this 25 April 2018

Just returned from the range with the M38.  My plan was to fine tune scope adjustments and then shoot targets for the Spring Icebreaker.  I was using a load which had proven to be very promising at 50 yards (shot at another location w/o 100 yard option).  The load (H4895 - 21.5gr; Lee 170gr Cruise Missile at 1560 fps) produced 10 shot group with 5 in one ragged hole.  It took, as always, many combinations of components and gnashing of teeth to get to that result.

At the range, set up at 100 yards, using the same load. The shots went everywhere.  Some didn't even land in the 12" target black.  It was if at some point beyond 50 yards the bullets decided to go in different directions.  It was so bad, I didn't even bother to shoot the match targets as it would have been a waste of effort and postage to send them in; don't think I'll get another chance at them to make the deadline.

I think there might be a quality control issue in ammo production.  I noticed last night that some of the rounds coming off the press had "variable COL".  Seems the Lee Liquid Alox bullets would sometimes stick in the Lyman seater die and then partially pull out a little when raising the press handle.  I caught this problem and reseated to desired COL.  I have to be careful to frequently clean the die to avoid this, or try a different lube.  

A while back I discovered the bullet is easily bent when dropping from the mold; so now cast slower with better result. Now I check all of them for runout.  The Hornady gas checks are crimped on in a purpose devised crimper that does not apply pressure to the bullet nose.

Leading does not seem to be a problem.  The bullets appear to be impacting the target stabilized.  Some of my other loads showed varying degrees of instability (both at higher and lower velocity).  I'm going to take a chamber cast tonight.

For a moment at the range I considered basket weaving as an alternative hobby, but then I realized that could be just as aggravating. 

I'm new to casting, so onward!

Jud

 

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
jchiggins posted this 25 April 2018

Just came across Larry Gibson's article "Accurate loading of cast bullets for the 6.5 Swede".

Larry, wherever you are, thank you very much for your professional and very informative article on loading for the Swede! 

Attached Files

John Alexander posted this 26 April 2018

Ken sez: "good question .... been wondering that myself ... i do notice that no body seems to be in the top half at any military matches with one ..... and i been watching for 15 years or so ....."

Ken, 

You missed one or two. Dan Hudson won his class with a Swede in the first or second  year that we had a military match in conjuction with the Nation Tournament.  In spite of his success he went on to other rifles maybe for better sights.

The old wisdom that small bores are hard to shoot becomes a self fullfilling prophecy when nobody shoots them.

 

John

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
  • Maven
Maven posted this 26 April 2018

I have an "as issued," CG (excellent condition) M 96 and never had a problem getting it to shoot accurately.  The problem I faced was bore diameter rather than velocity, although I doubt I ever exceeded 1,600fps with my loads.  Unlike my friends' M 96's, mine required a .267" dia. CB rather than the more common .266".  Veral Smith cut a ~140gr. SPGC mold for me that was quite accurate.  Somewhere along the way, I purchased what I suspect was a custom-made Lee Precision CB (looked like a downsized Lyman #31141) and later, a group buy 6 cavity Lee mold (a "reduced" Ly. #311407).  Both of those were extremely accurate and a tad lighter @ 133gr. than the LBT CB's.  The other accurate CB I tried was the 150gr. Ed Schmitt designed tapered CB, which Lyman produced in the 1990's.  As for loads, 9 - 10gr. Unique, small doses of AA #9, 5744, or IMR 4198 worked very well.  (Sorry, but I no longer have the exact data, but some may be found on the Boolits site via a Google search).  WC 860, OTOH, gave erratic results and plenty of unburned powder even with LR magnum primers.

Btw, the M 96 hasn't been fired in more than 18 months and is for sale:  Too many guns, too little time!

 

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
Ken Campbell Iowa posted this 26 April 2018

maven ... yes on the "" oversize "" throats in the swedes .......   although military rifles tend to err or the side of functionality ......

i bot a couple lee special molds .... both 0.268 groove, one with a 0.264 nose !! .....  but managed to trade both the molds and my m38s all off before i could give them a fair test .

i now have an rcbs 140 gr fn .... i will have to glue on a scope so that i can give it a fair chance ....  maybe i will get lucky !! 

ken

 

Attached Files

Larry Gibson posted this 26 April 2018

You're very welcome.  I have made a couple updates to that article based on subsequent test.  I can repost here if you'd like?

LMG

Concealment is not cover.........

Attached Files

Reese posted this 27 April 2018

Please do post your latest.

Attached Files

Ken Campbell Iowa posted this 27 April 2018

looking forward to updates larry ... my wife is swedish so i have to make a prince valiant effort to create a 100 yard coke can buster ......... whew this will be a new very high bar for myself and my shooting skills .... any pointers are welcome !!!

ken

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • delmarskid
Larry Gibson posted this 27 April 2018

Accurate loading of cast bullets for the 6.5 Swede

The 6.5 Swede in it’s original milsurp form is castigated by many as very difficult to load accurate cast bullet loads for, especially at what is considered to be “high velocity”. If you have an original military M96 or M38 that shoots quality jacketed loads into sub 2 moa then it is also reasonable to expect quality cast bullet loads to shoot into the same 2 moa, albeit at a much lesser velocity than the jacketed bullet loads. With the 6.5 Swede most cast bullet shooters consider any velocity above 1500 fps as “high velocity”. Many have developed very decent loads that push 1800+ fps. However to get into the realm of 1900-2400 fps with a 6.5 Swede and maintain 2 moa accuracy at 100 yards and beyond takes some doing and most often is not doable with components at hand.

The problems are several; first there is the fast twist. Normal cast bullets accuracy is adversely affected by RPM above a certain RPM threshold. That threshold is usually in the 120-140,000 RPM range depending on bullet design and the loading components used.  Thus with normal cast bullet loads accuracy with the 6.5 Swede will be best in the 1200 to 1500 fps range with cast bullets. Going above this RPM threshold very quickly can have an adverse non-linear affect on accuracy. Then there is the odd size of the 6.5 Swede’s groove depth. Most are .266 to .268” groove depth with a .258 - .260” bore. Most modern 6.5 moulds do not cast bullets large enough for a proper fit as they are made for the modern .264” groove depth of today’s 6.5 caliber rifles. These modern moulds do drop cast bullets that still provide yeoman service with loads in or under the RPM threshold. However. if you want to increase the velocity above the RPM threshold and maintain accuracy you must have a mould that casts bullets which fit the groove depth and/or the bore of your particular 6.5 Swede rifle. A last but not insurmountable problem is the generous chamber dimensions of many milsurp 6.5 Swede rifles, especially the M96.

Let us address the steps, equipment and components that will give adequate cast bullet accuracy up through 1800+ fps and give you a solid base to attempt higher velocity if desired. We shall assume that you already have the normal array of reloading equipment to load ammunition and to cast bullets.

The cartridge case;
Most milsurp 6.5 Swedes have generous chamber dimensions. Not only does headspace differ considerably between many older M96s and the newer M38s but the chamber necks are usually of large diameter and considerably longer than most “trim to lengths”. For cast bullet shooting ideally we want a concentric neck that fits the length of the chamber neck and with walls of sufficient thickness that only a small amount of expansion is done when the cartridge is fired. This lessons the obturation of the base and shank area of the bullet to a much larger diameter than the throat. Thus less distortion of the bullet when pushed up into the throat with the base of the bullet (GC) also tends to stay square to the bore for better accuracy. Most factory 6.5 Swede cases have fairly thin necks. There are a couple exceptions but mostly on a lot to lot basis. It is best to form the cases from milsurp 30-06 cases. By doing such you can have the thickest necks possible and also trim them to the proper length for your rifles chamber.

I like to use once fired ’06 cases of one lot or headstamp. I clean the cases, deprime them and remove the crimp if necessary. I then initially form them in a 8x57 form die and the excess case length is cut off. I then anneal the case neck and shoulder. The preformed cases are then FL sized in a 7x57 die with the depriming stem removed. I then sacrifice one case by trimming it way too short to adjust the headspace of the 6.5 FL die to match the headspace of the rifles chamber. I begin to size this case down using a 6.5x55 FL die a little at a time (I adjust the FL die in ¼ turn at a time), trying to chamber the case in Accurate loading of cast bullets for the 6.5 Swede

The 6.5 Swede in it’s original milsurp form is castigated by many as very difficult to load accurate cast bullet loads for, especially at what is considered to be “high velocity”. If you have an original military M96 or M38 that shoots quality jacketed loads into sub 2 moa then it is also reasonable to expect quality cast bullet loads to shoot into the same 2 moa, albeit at a much lesser velocity than the jacketed bullet loads. With the 6.5 Swede most cast bullet shooters consider any velocity above 1500 fps as “high velocity”. Many have developed very decent loads that push 1800+ fps. However to get into the realm of 1900-2400 fps with a 6.5 Swede and maintain 2 moa accuracy at 100 yards and beyond takes some doing and most often is not doable with components at hand.

The problems are several; first there is the fast twist. Normal cast bullets accuracy is adversely affected by RPM above a certain RPM threshold. That threshold is usually in the 120-140,000 RPM range depending on bullet design and the loading components used.  Thus with normal cast bullet loads accuracy with the 6.5 Swede will be best in the 1200 to 1500 fps range with cast bullets. Going above this RPM threshold very quickly can have an adverse non-linear affect on accuracy. Then there is the odd size of the 6.5 Swede’s groove depth. Most are .266 to .268” groove depth with a .258 - .260” bore. Most modern 6.5 moulds do not cast bullets large enough for a proper fit as they are made for the modern .264” groove depth of today’s 6.5 caliber rifles. These modern moulds do drop cast bullets that still provide yeoman service with loads in or under the RPM threshold. However. if you want to increase the velocity above the RPM threshold and maintain accuracy you must have a mould that casts bullets which fit the groove depth and/or the bore of your particular 6.5 Swede rifle. A last but not insurmountable problem is the generous chamber dimensions of many milsurp 6.5 Swede rifles, especially the M96.

Let us address the steps, equipment and components that will give adequate cast bullet accuracy up through 1800+ fps and give you a solid base to attempt higher velocity if desired. We shall assume that you already have the normal array of reloading equipment to load ammunition and to cast bullets.

The cartridge case;
Most milsurp 6.5 Swedes have generous chamber dimensions. Not only does headspace differ considerably between many older M96s and the newer M38s but the chamber necks are usually of large diameter and considerably longer than most “trim to lengths”. For cast bullet shooting ideally we want a concentric neck that fits the length of the chamber neck and with walls of sufficient thickness that only a small amount of expansion is done when the cartridge is fired. This lessons the obturation of the base and shank area of the bullet to a much larger diameter than the throat. Thus less distortion of the bullet when pushed up into the throat with the base of the bullet (GC) also tends to stay square to the bore for better accuracy. Most factory 6.5 Swede cases have fairly thin necks. There are a couple exceptions but mostly on a lot to lot basis. It is best to form the cases from milsurp 30-06 cases. By doing such you can have the thickest necks possible and also trim them to the proper length for your rifles chamber.

I like to use once fired ’06 cases of one lot or headstamp. I clean the cases, deprime them and remove the crimp if necessary. I then initially form them in a 8x57 form die and the excess case length is cut off. I then anneal the case neck and shoulder. The preformed cases are then FL sized in a 7x57 die with the depriming stem removed. I then sacrifice one case by trimming it way too short to adjust the headspace of the 6.5 FL die to match the headspace of the rifles chamber. I begin to size this case down using a 6.5x55 FL die a little at a time (I adjust the FL die in ¼ turn at a time), trying to chamber the case in 

 

Concealment is not cover.........

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
  • delmarskid
Larry Gibson posted this 27 April 2018

the rifle between each sizing. Once the case is sized so I have a “crush fit” closing of the bolt on the case the rest of the cases are then run into the thus adjusted 6.5 Swede FL die. All of the cases then will have this “crush fit” when chambered.  This minimizes case head stretch at the case web during fire forming.  It also helps keep the case centered during fire forming.   Additionally the depriming stem for the 6.5 FL die is adjusted so the expander is just below the case neck as it is pulled out of the die. This is like the position of the expander in Forster/Bonanza Bench rest dies and keeps the necks a lot straighter (concentric) as they come out of the sizing operation. Of course the inside of the necks are well lubed for this sizing. One of the FL sized cases is then trimmed to length by trimming only a little at a time until the bolt just closes on the case when chambering. The rest of the sized cases are then trimmed to that length.  I then chamfer the outside of the necks and use a Lyman long taper case neck reamer to ream the inside of the case mouths.

The cases are ready for fire forming. Everyone knows that most all ’06 cases are a few thousandths smaller in the head diameter than Swede cases (though many modern Swede cases are now the same diameter as ’06 cases). To get even expansion at the expansion ring I use a small one thickness wrap of cellophane tape around the case head. The cellophane is only about ¼” wide and is necessary only for fire forming the case. The cellophane centers the case head in the rear of the chamber for the initial fire forming. The cases do need too be fire formed before any serious cast bullet load development can begin. I use a top end jacketed bullet load to fire form my cases with jacketed bullets (mostly with bulk Remington 120 gr bullets). I usually like to fire 3 such fire forming loads in each case to ensure complete fire forming of the case to be used for cast bullets. I use a permanent marker and mark the rims in 3 spots 120 degrees apart. The first mark is usually over the headstamp arsenal initials and this first mark is placed up when the case is initially fired. Then on each additional firing I simply rotate the case to the next mark. Of course the cases are neck sized (neck size die) for the subsequent reloads. I may or may not anneal the necks again. Once fully fire formed I then outside turn the necks a very small amount to ensure concentricity.

Additionally I will drill out the flash holes with a #30 (#28 being the largest drill to use) to prevent the attendant shoulder setback caused by the primer explosion with reduced loads. If I do not drill the flash holes out I at least then uniform and deburr them with a Lyman tool but drilling the flash hole out gives the best results. All of this case preparation may seem tedious and a pain but if one wants the best accuracy with cast bullets then a proper fit of the case neck is necessary. This is especially the case if you are going to push the RPM threshold into higher velocities. The bullet needs all the support in the case neck it can get. The use of properly formed 6.5 Swede cases using ’06 cases is the best way to do it.

Sizing the case;
Once you have gone to the trouble of forming 6.5 Swede cases from ’06 cases it is ridiculous to ruin them by FL sizing them or by even attempting to “partial size” them. Doing either will only lead to frustration with lack of accuracy and negate the benefits of the properly fitted case to your rifles chamber. Doing either will also lead to early incipient case head separation.  Obviously you will want to neck size only. The Lee collet die is a good one for this but with the thicker necks of the formed cases it may not give consistent results of neck tension. A regular NS 6.5 die can be used but those are made for .264 diameter bullets and size the neck way too much. Using a standard 6.5 NS die will require a custom expander for the M-die if you do not want to bend or distort softer alloyed cast bullets during seating. Either bending or distorting or both during seating is easy to do with the long thin 6.5 cast bullets.  Bent and/or distorted cast bullets are not conducive to

Concealment is not cover.........

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
Larry Gibson posted this 27 April 2018

 

accuracy so best they not be bent. With the uniform thickness and concentricity of the formed case I’ve found the best method to neck size is with bushing dies. I use Redding bushing dies for this but at least 2 other makers of bushing dies are available. I’ve found that with a small assortment of different diameter bushings I can size the cases just enough to give perfect neck tension (.002&rdquo with no distortion of the bullet when seated. With a proper reaming of the sized case mouth to accept the base of the cast bullet with the Lyman minimal taper neck reamer (VLD style) the use of an M-die is also many times not necessary. With the use of the proper bushing there is no need for an expander and the Lee Universal expander will work fine to slightly flare the case mouth so the cast bullet can be easily seated if the case mouths are not reamed.  The Lyman M-die of 6.5 size also works fine but the neck expander part does not touch the inside of the properly sized case necks.

 

 

 

Primers;
The selection of what primer to use may come down, particularly these days, to what you can get. In many recent tests of primers I’ve found that most regular LR primers work equally well. Many times though a magnum or magnum type primer (such as CCIs #34s) will not work best with many powders. It is best to use regular primers with cast bullet rifle loads unless you are using very slow burning powders (slower than RL22) or most ball powders (medium and slow burners). In extensive testing with an Oehler M43 which measures external and internal ballistics including pressure I have found little to no difference between CCI 200, Federal 210, WLRs and Remington 9 1/2s with cast bullet loads using powders from Bullseye up through H4831SC. As mentioned, with slower powders or medium to slow burning ball powders, the hotter magnum type primers might be best.

 

 

 

I’ve read and have been told many times that primers of very low brisance such as large pistol primers can improve accuracy. Most often it goes something like this; “I was working up a HV load in my ’06 and at 2000 fps the accuracy was 4 moa. When I switched to a “such or such” low brisance primer the accuracy went back to 2 moa.” Well there is some truth to that but I’ve found through considerable that most often the 4 moa load was above the RPM threshold and when switching to a low brisance primer the velocity/RPM dropped back down to within the RPM threshold. I’ve found that there can be as much a 200+ fps different with some powders, particularly with the slow burning powders, simply by changing primers. The lowering of the velocity from 2000 fps down to the 1800 fps range and back under the RPM threshold is actually what improved the accuracy. Thus it can be said that changing primers can affect accuracy. However if we work up a load with one primer and accuracy is good then by switching to another primer is there seldom found an increase in accuracy unless we are bouncing above and below the RPM threshold. I use and always suggest to others that a good regular LR primer like the CCI, Federal, WLR or Remington will work quite well in the 6.5 Swede with most powders.

Powder selection;
Selecting an appropriate powder for the 6.5 Swede to use with cast bullets can be confusing. Many times the selection is made based simply on the powder(s) we have available on our shelf at home at the time. This many times works out fine if we have an appropriate powder available for the velocity range we are looking for and weight of cast bullet we have. With cast bullets of 120-130 gr and a velocity of upwards of 1400 fps Unique or a similar burning rate powder will work fine. For velocities up into 1600-1800 fps then the slow burning end of the pistol powders and the fast burning end of the rifle powders work very well. Here we find 2400, 4227, 5744, 4198 and 4759 to work well.

 

 

 

 

If we want to shoot a cast bullet of this weight faster then we must really begin to look at acceleration (the time/pressure curve) that the powder will have on the cast bullet. For higher velocity loads we want to accelerate the bullet to that velocity over a longer time. For this we must look at the medium and slow burning powders. H4895, 3031, 4064, Varget, RL15, RL19, 4350 and H4831SC are the ones to try here. Slower burning powders and even some of these will reach 100% case capacity/loading density before velocities get into truly high velocity for a 6.5 Swede. Another problem with slow burning powders is erratic ignition or pressures not getting high enough for consistent powder burn. The 6.5 Swede cartridge is not one of large capacity so a balance must be reached between the weight of the cast bullet, the burning rate of the powder and consistent ignition/burn. The use of magnum type primers may help a little here with the slow burning powders that are giving 90 – 100+ loading density.

With cast bullets of 140+ gr in weight the selection of powder to use is a bit different. For the low end loads the slow burning end of the pistol powders and the fast burning end of the rifle powders work best. Here very good accuracy can be had in the 1400 – 1600 fps range. If everything is done correctly then very good accuracy up through 1800 fps can be had with those powders. However, most are finding the best success with the slower burning rifle powders.  They are also finding that such very slow burning powders that give 90 – 100+ loading density are working well. Again, particularly when using such slow burning powders, the balance between loading density, velocity and consistent ignition for the velocity desired must be found.

 

 

Bullet selection;
If we are keeping the velocity of our selected cast bullet down in or under the RPM threshold then just about any quality mould of regular design will give decent accuracy. However if we are selecting a cast bullet for the 6.5 Swede at velocity/RPM above the RPM threshold then that requires some thought must be given to the selection to the design of a cast bullet. If we want the “best” accuracy out of our 6.5 Swede, even at a velocity/RPM within the RPM threshold then the same requirement for design of the cast bullet applies. The selected cast bullet must fit. It is that simple. This “fit” must be from the bottom of the case neck, in the throat, against the leade and into the bore if the selected cast bullet has a bore riding nose. If we are pushing for best accuracy and high velocity/RPM then the GC must not extend into the case below the case neck. The base/shank of the cast bullet needs all of the support it can get during acceleration. It must not be allowed to bend, rivet or get gas cut. Also important is keeping the bottom of the GC square with the centerline of the bore. If the base gets crooked then the “launch” from the muzzle will not be even and accuracy adversely affected. We must keep the cast bullet centered and concentric and the best way to do that is to keep the entire cast bullet in the case neck and the chamber throat. If you truly want to get into high velocity then a long bore riding nose unless it has a very tight fit is not conducive to accuracy at really high RPM.

Most milsurp 6.5 Swede’s have long throats. Most of these are at or slightly larger than groove diameter. The most accurate cast bullet is one that fills the throat length with the shoulder/front driving band slightly engraving on the leade. If the cast bullet has a bore riding nose then the nose should be a tight fit with some slight engraving of the nose by the lands. I have come to avoid cast bullets with long bore riding noses if I want to get into high velocity/RPM with any accuracy.  The basic idea here is to get maximum support of the entire cast bullet from the base to the ogive. This will allow for minimal bending and obturation during acceleration.

Two commonly found bullet designs for the 6.5 are Lovern designs and bore riders with long noses. The common Lovern designs are Lyman’s 266455 and 266469. The common

 

 

Concealment is not cover.........

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
Larry Gibson posted this 27 April 2018

 

bore riders are Lyman’s 466673, RCBS 6.5-140-SIL and Saeco’s #264. There is also a “Cruise Missile” design available as a special order from  Lee. My experience with numerous of them has narrowed my choice down to 266455 which is a Lyman Lovern design with no bore riding nose. That 266455 design fits the case neck and throat of all 4 of my 6.5 Swedes perfectly and with no bore riding nose to contend with it has proven to be the most accurate design for the 6.5 Swede up through 2000 fps. Cast of most alloys it runs from 125 -130 gr in weight with GC and lube. It has provided me with the best accuracy across a broad spectrum of velocity in the fast twist Swede. Many find good accuracy with the other designs but most often it is in or below the RPM threshold. The Lyman Lovern design gives the best accuracy at higher velocities from the 6.5 Swede and also the same basic design gives the best accuracy in other calibers as well.

 

 

 

[Note; since writing this I have had considerable experience with 2 other cast bullets in the 6.5 Swede.  The 130 gr Kurtz is an excellent design that rivals the 266455 in performance and low and high velocity.  The 6.5 “Cruise Missile” I just too much of a “good idea”.  It is very difficult to get to shoot even reasonably well and is a waste of time and money in my estimate.]

Bullet Alloys;
There are numerous schools of thought on this. Some like to use hard alloys and some like their alloys soft. Others like them of medium hardness in the 16-18 BHN range. I have found that best accuracy, especially at higher velocity is best achieved with an alloy that is ductile. In other words it is not brittle. If one is keeping velocities down in the 1400-1500 fps range in the Swede then an alloy of straight WWs usually suffices. Though I like to add 2% tin to the WWs. This changes the composition of the alloy making the cast bullets a little more ductile and the bullets cast better with less rejections due to non fill out. My best accuracy alloy with cast bullets at high velocity not only with the Swede but with other caliber/cartridges has been with an alloy of WWs + linotype at a mix of 60/40 or 70/30. This gives a BHN of 18-20 with air cooled bullets. They are ductile and hold up well to high acceleration and velocity. I have been using WWs + lead at a mix of 50/50 for a long time in higher velocity hunting cast bullet loads. I have found accuracy to be excellent for the first 5-7 shots out of a cold clean barrel. Problem is that fouling quickly builds and then accuracy deteriorates. Thus such bullets cast of that soft alloy are not good for general shooting but are great for hunting where more than 5-7 shots are not fired anyway. Again a balance must be found here between the bullet being ductile instead of brittle, the alloy being able to withstand the acceleration at the velocity desired and the terminal impact requirements.

 

 

[Note; since writing this I have considerable experience with alloys above 2500 fps through 3000+ fps.  I have found Lyman $2 alloy (90/5/5) to be the best performing ternary alloy for use in high velocity cast bullet loads.]

I cast my 6.5 bullets in a single cavity mould. This gives the most consistent cast bullet which is conducive to the best accuracy. I then give them a visual inspection for non fill out or wrinkle with all defects causing rejection. For high velocity/RPM loads I then weight each bullet and reject all bullets not within a +/- .2 gr of the mean average of the lot. This means a larger rejection percentage of bullets but the accuracy results at high velocity/RPM justify it.

Bullet lubes;
My experience based on numerous side by side tests of numerous bullet lubes at low, medium and high velocity, show that there is little difference between many lubes. Let me say also that there are some bad lubes out there for high velocity use in rifles both commercial ones and home concocted ones. The time to test a bullet at high velocity/RPM above the RPM threshold is not also the time to test a home concocted lube. Run the high velocity/RPM test with a known lube that works and then test the home brewed concoction against that. There are numerous good commercial lubes that work at high velocity/RPM such as Javelina, XLOX 2500+, Carnauba Red, LBT Blue, LBT blue soft, and Orange Magic. There are probably others as well but those are the ones I have specifically tested and find them to work equally well. If you are using a bad lube and switch to a good one then a great improvement in accuracy can be had. However, I have found through meticulous tests at high velocity that if you are using a good lube to begin with and switch to another good lube then little to no improvement in accuracy is likely to occur with such high velocity/RPM loads.

Gas Checks;
We basically have 4 types of GCs to pick from. Hornady, Lyman (reputed to be made by Hornady), the GB GCs and the home made ones by various tools. Quite frankly I use all of them and they all give very accurate results if the velocity/RPM level is below the RPM threshold. However when we get above that threshold then some things must be considered. The GC for such loads must have a flat inside bottom for the shank of the cast bullet to seat squarely into. The GB GCs do not have flat inside bottoms and must be flattened with a well fitted punch. I find little difference between Hornady and Lyman GCs, perhaps because they are of the same make. Some anneal the GCs but I do not. I tried it several times and found no benefit in accuracy. One thing that is of benefit to accuracy is the need to seat the GC squarely on the bullet shank. I use several methods to do this but mostly seat GCs as separate step to ensure it is done right. A Lyman GC seater for the 450 Lubrasizer works for most of my needs.

Sizing the cast bullets;
Once the GC is properly seated I prefer to size the bullet in a push through sizer if the bullet is to be sized .001’ or more. This also crimps the GC on. A light coat of spray case lube on the cast bullets prior to this initial sizing makes them size easily. I like to size the bullets in the push through to the same size as the H die in the 450 Lubrasizer so that there is no bending or distortion of the bullet when run through the 450 for lubing as the H die is then not sizing the bullet. When lubing the bullets in the 450 I run the bullets into the H die twice to ensure the lube fills all of the lube grooves completely.

I have 4 milsurp 6.5 Swedes. They all have throats of .266-267” diameters. I size the 266455s at .266”. If they are .0005” over that then the bullets will be pushed back into the case when the round is chambered. Cast bullets for the 6.5 Swede really need to be sized to that close of a fit in the long throat of the Swede for the best accuracy, particularly at the higher velocity/RPM.

Seating the bullets;
I’ve used several 6.5 Swede seating dies over the years and they all work fine with .264 diameter bullets. However most of them don’t work well with .266 or larger cast bullets and most often the larger cast bullet sticks in the seating die and does not seat properly. The seating die can be honed out to allow the larger bullet but this might cause alignment problems with jacketed bullets (yes I do still use them). My solution was a simple one. I use a 7x57 seating die. I thought I might have some concentricity problems but given the neck sizing method I use to adjust neck tension and the long taper neck reaming the 6.5 cast bullets seat straight in the 7x57 die.

Concealment is not cover.........

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
Larry Gibson posted this 27 April 2018

Testing;


Testing should be done from a solid bench rest using proven shooting techniques. Testing

should be initially done at 100 yards with additional test at 200 yards. Your accuracy goal for cast bullets should be the same as the rifle is capable of with good jacketed bullet loads. Shoot 5 five shot groups with the quality jacketed loads. If the best group is 1.5” then that is good but not your goal. If the average group size is 2” then that still is not your goal. If the largest group was 2.5” then that is your goal; to shoot consistent 5 shot groups with cast bullet groups of 2.5” or smaller at 100 yards. You and your rifle may shoot better than that as I was just giving an example.  Your goal and expectations need to be based on your rifles capability in conjunction with your own shooting ability.  Because some one else may get 1” groups with their 6.5 Swede does not mean that your rifle and/or you are capable of that.  The potential may be there with the rifle but we, the shooter, may not be up to that potential yet.  Thus we must accept what our capabilities with our rifle are and set our goal for accuracy to match that capability.

 

 

 

The point is the smallest group you shoot is not the accuracy potential of your rifle and neither is the average group size. The largest group is the actual accuracy potential because you never know when you will shoot that size of group. You can’t say; “I’m going to shoot the smallest group now.” Nor can you say; “now I’ll shoot an average size group.” You just shoot the best you can and the group will be what it is. This is because 25 shots (the aggregate of the 5 five shot groups) going into a 2.5” group is actually indicative of the true accuracy potential of that rifle with that ammunition with you shooting it. This is why you should use a good quality jacketed bullet load to conduct this test.  It gives you the accuracy potential of your rifle and you and thus you can best set a practical and obtainable accuracy goal for your cast bullet loads.

 

 

A chronograph should be used with your load development.  They are inexpensive and easy to use.  They also tell you quite a bit about your loads that a single group will not tell you.  They give you the actual velocity of your loads instead of a “guesstimate’.  However the best thing about the chronograph is that it measures the consistency of the ignition. This is done by measuring the Extreme Spread and the Standard deviation.  The smaller the ES/SD is the more consistent the load.  Consistency of ignition is a key to accuracy especially at high velocity.  However, many pay to much homage to the SD.  I have been comparing the ES to SD and to the actually accuracy of many, many different loads out of many, many different rifles since ’89 when I got my first Oehler M35P that gave both the ES and the SD.  My previous chronograph (also an Oehler) gave only the ES.  I like to look for a load that gives the lowest ES with an SD that is 25 – 45% of the ES.  Too many times have I had shot strings that gave a low SD with a high ES to look solely at the SD.  Such strings of shots usually have one or two flyers that cause the higher ES and also show up as flyers on the target.  Both the ES and the SD must be paid attention to.  Use a chronograph during testing otherwise you are just guessing at velocity and the consistency of the load.

Work up your cast bullet loads initially in 5 shot groups. Switch to 10 shot groups when things look good with a particular load. If things are really looking good with a particular load and it is within your goal then shoot 5 five shot groups of that load or 3 ten shot groups. Either of those tests will show if the load is really consistent and accurate. If the load is consistent and is at or above the RPM threshold (140,000 RPM) then I suggest a 10 shot group at 200 yards. If the load is indeed good then the group size will be closely linear expansion in size to the 100 yard group size. For example if the 100 yard group is 2” and the 200 yard group is 4- 4.5” then all is well. However if the 200 yard group size is not linear (say it is 8-10”+) to the 100 yard group size then the bullets are unbalanced during acceleration and the RPM is causing the attendant inaccuracy during flight.

 

 

 

Conclusion;
Using the above techniques I have loaded very accurate cast bullets loads in numerous milsurp 6.5 Swede rifles. There are other techniques that perhaps work as well. There is no secret to any of the techniques I use as all of the information is available in Lyman’s Cast Bullet Handbook, the NRA Cast bullet supplements and numerous other publications. I do not go out in my garage in the dark of the night during the witching hour and brew up anything. I have no secrets, no myths, no old wife’s tales and use no witchcraft. What I use is just good loading techniques coupled with an understanding of internal and external ballistics. Anyone with some experience in reloading and casting bullets should be able to do what I have done. Keep in mind that the 6.5 Swede is indeed a difficult cartridge to load cast bullets for simply because many load them at too fast a velocity. The fast twist (1 turn in 7.8&rdquo results in extremely high RPMs as the velocity increases. Unless all is done correctly in the casting and loading getting accurate loads above the RPM threshold can and is difficult. I, and others, have gotten very good accuracy up through 1800-1900 fps out of a couple 6.5 Swedes. However I have not been successful with a consistently accurate load over 2000 fps. Several loads held the promise of a young girls good night kiss but then her dad opened door, i.e. I was not able to consistently duplicate any consistently accuracy load above 2000 fps. When a couple promising loads were tested at 200 yards the groups (10 shot) went from 2" or so (with a scope sighted 6.5 Swede) at 100 yards to 12-20" groups at 200 yards, hardly linear by anyone's stretch of the imagination and definite proof they were above the RPM Threshold. I very seldom could even reproduce the 2" group at 100 yards. Velocities here were 2000 - 2200 fps. This is not to say that I will stop trying as the 6.5 Swede rifles are fun to shoot and probably close to the ultimate challenge in obtaining accuracy at high velocity with cast bullets in a rifle.

 

 

 

[Note; subsequent testing with the 266455 and the Kurtz bullets using 4350 powder and either a Dacron or Grex filler produced somewhat consistent 2 moa accuracy +/- at 100 and 200 yards with 5 shot groups. However, there were always flyers with 10 shot groups that indicated the loads inconsistency above the RPM Threshold.  Since completing all the testing with the 6.5 Swede I am content with cast bullet loads in the 1400 – 1800 fps range, depending on bullet used.]  

Larry Gibson

 

Concealment is not cover.........

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
Ken Campbell Iowa posted this 28 April 2018

thanks larry ... will take a couple minutes and digest this very good info cool

i think i will make my swede a special project this summer ...  trigger, bedding, and bullet fit ... be fun !!

ken

Attached Files

Scearcy posted this 28 April 2018

Larry

Much excellent info. Broadly applicable to other calibers too. I am making some notes for my 243s. My compliments.

Jim

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
jchiggins posted this 29 April 2018

Thank you very much Larry!

I decided to set the M38 aside in favor of a M96 that I have not shot in about 15 years.  After taking chamber castings of the two rifles, the M96 showed a shorter throat and marginally better bore.

Along the lines of your comment, I discovered an RCBS seater die handles the bullet better than the Lyman I was using; not having the problem of the bullet sticking anymore (well, so far).  With the M96, I can get the 6.5 brass to fit the chamber properly, although my next step is to convert 30-06 brass per your outline. Onward.

Attached Files

R. Dupraz posted this 29 April 2018

 Shazzzam ! After seeing all the activity and info on this thread, I may just keep this 96 now instead of sending it down the road !

 

R. 

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
Ken Campbell Iowa posted this 30 April 2018

geeeeze RD, that is a fine looking rig .... i can see why you drug it home .... my mongrel swede wishes Herter's was still around ... i might even go for the $18 extra nice grain wood semi-finished blank ... i still remember the smell of the wood as i chipped away on them for a week or two each rifle ....

ken

 

Attached Files

R. Dupraz posted this 30 April 2018

Some one did a decent job of it. At this inning of the game I have vowed to start getting rid of some stuff but more stuff continually shows up. Haven't figured that one out yet. 

Yup, had that Herter's catalogue memorized back in the day. Particularly the walnut blank section. If I would have had any sense at all back then, should have invested all my $ in their walnut instead of cars and W and W and...etc...etc...etc. No telling how much stuff could be drug home now. 

 

R. 

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
Larry Gibson posted this 30 April 2018

Nice, looks like someone did a decent job of sporterizing that Swede.  My sporter Swede is a "scout" which I really like.  I also picked up a new milsurp M38 barrel and put it on a Mexican SR M98.  Both are excellent shooters with cast and jacketed.

Concealment is not cover.........

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
R. Dupraz posted this 30 April 2018

That Swede is a heavy brute. Must weigh close to ten pounds. Course everything is heavy anymore. 

I am beginning to finally see the advantages in the ''scout rifle'' concept. But don't do much scouting anymore except for that magical "one holer" at the target line. Old dogs and new trick thing I guess.

Dang it ! Another new mold again.

 

R.

 

 

 

 

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
shastaboat posted this 01 May 2018

I haven't been on here for several years and saw this post so I thought I'd share my failures and success.  First of all I used the Lyman 266469 and could never get any decent groups with various powders for over 2 years of testing.  I got lots of keyholes at all velocities.  Eventually I figured I was bending the bullets when sizing.  I located a 266455 mold and began to shoot decent groups.  I ended up dropping the velocity to 1650-1700 fps and can now shoot 1" groups all day long.  I was casting with 7 lbs WW and 3 Lbs lino to get 126 gr bullets.  I then went to straight WW at 130 gr and with 14 gr of 7625 my velocity was 1651 fps with an ES of 15 fps.  Since 7625 is now discontinued I would probably use around 15 gr of 2400 and get the velocity to 1650 fps and do just as well.  Those 266455 bullets loaded to just kiss the lands only leave about .100" in the neck.  I've heard that some people claim they get the 266469 to shoot accurately but I doubt it.

 

Because I said so!

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • RicinYakima
  • M3 Mitch
RicinYakima posted this 01 May 2018

Nice to see you back, shastaboat.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
shastaboat posted this 27 October 2018

I just saw this thread.  I worked for 2 years to finally get my 96 sporter with my ultralight turned 18.5" mil barrel to shoot 1 moa cast at 100 yards.  I also had trouble bending the Lyman 140 gr 266469 bullets cast in WW + 30% lino when sizing .266.  Eventually I found an unusual 266455 with two gas check cuts at the base.  One on top of the other...go figure.  This was the answer loaded long kissing the lands with reduced velocity at 1676 fps.  I then tried straight WW with the same load and got as good results.  This combo shoots into 1" all day long at 100 yards.  My rifle weighs in at 6.5 lbs.  I eventually re-chambered to AI and it still shoots as well but velocity dropped to about 1600 fps.   I may up the charge a bit to get it up to 1700 fps.  This rifle is a gem to carry but is so light it is difficult to shoot small groups.  I found I needed to hold the forearm especially with my full house jacketed rounds.  I shoot 120 gr jacketed to 2815 fps;   85 gr  jacketed shoot easily at 3036 fps; 140 jacketed to 2672 fps.  I really didn't get much more velocity by AI'ing this chamber with such a short barrel.

Because I said so!

Attached Files

Scearcy posted this 27 February 2019

I happened on one of the Ruger Hawkeye African models chambered for 6.5x55 today. Other than the price, it is an exceedingly nice rifle. I reread this thread and felt it was worth pulling forward again. Thanks Larry! 

Jim

Attached Files

David Reiss CBA Membership Director posted this 28 February 2019

Thanks Jim, perfect timing with my 6.5X55 Swede CZ-550 arriving Friday. 

David Reiss - NRA Life Member & PSC Range Member Retired Police Firearms Instructor/Armorer
-Services: Wars Fought, Uprisings Quelled, Bars Emptied, Revolutions Started, Tigers Tamed, Assassinations Plotted, Women Seduced, Governments Run, Gun Appraisals, Lost Treasure Found.
- Also deal in: Land, Banjos, Nails, Firearms, Manure, Fly Swatters, Used Cars, Whisky, Racing Forms, Rare Antiquities, Lead, Used Keyboard Keys, Good Dogs, Pith Helmets & Zulu Headdresses. .

Attached Files

Scearcy posted this 28 February 2019

David

I have identified my trading stock and there is a real chance that Ruger African is going to follow me home soon.

Jim

Attached Files

dualsport posted this 02 March 2019

Thanks Jim, perfect timing with my 6.5X55 Swede CZ-550 arriving Friday. --Now you're talking! Full stock? In my humble opinion the CZ550's are the bee's knees for a real rifleman. Pictures please. I want one bad but can not have any more children. I do have one in 30-06 that I'm using for the Coyote Match.

Attached Files

shjoe posted this 02 March 2019

great looking rifle, R Dupraz. it shurly looks like a keeper.

Attached Files

Brodie posted this 02 March 2019

I bought a 6.5 Creedmore when they were first offered, and while it is very accurate and a pleasure to shoot I just don't like the pressures it runs at with jacketed.  About a year ago I found a 6.5x55 in a Churchill that I could afford.  I have not tried cast in it yet but it is a pure pleasure to shoot.  The rifle exhibits excellent accuracy and low recoil.  While it is not a 96 (the action looks like one of Weatherby's new models ) it is still a sweet heart.

My question is: "How do you load cast so as to deal with that fast twist (one in 6 or 7)?

Thank You.

B.E.Brickey

Attached Files

alamogunr posted this 02 March 2019

 

"Just came across Larry Gibson's article "Accurate loading of cast bullets for the 6.5 Swede".

Larry, wherever you are, thank you very much for your professional and very informative article on loading for the Swede!"

 

Going through old threads to see what might be interesting, I ran across this one.  Since I have had a Swede for several years but never tried to develop cast loads for it, I decided to learn what I can.  I probably can't follow Larry Gibson's trials  but maybe I can learn something.

My point in resurrecting this thread is to ask where the original article might be found?

 

 

Attached Files

alamogunr posted this 02 March 2019

"Just came across Larry Gibson's article "Accurate loading of cast bullets for the 6.5 Swede".

Larry, wherever you are, thank you very much for your professional and very informative article on loading for the Swede!"

 

Going through old threads to see what might be interesting, I ran across this one.  Since I have had a Swede for several years but never tried to develop cast loads for it, I decided to learn what I can.  I probably can't follow Larry Gibson's trials  but maybe I can learn something.

My point in resurrecting this thread is to ask where the original article might be found?

Attached Files

Scearcy posted this 03 March 2019

Does anyone know if the chambers of commercial 6.5x55 rifles are demonstrably tighter than those of the Military Mausers. I have my eye on a new Ruger that has been on the dealers shelf quite some time. Everything I have found on the internet is written about the military rifles with large long throats. I'll have to buy that rifle before I can measure for myself.

Any experiences anyone has had would be helpful.

Jim

Attached Files

RicinYakima posted this 03 March 2019

Well, I had a Remington 700 Classic when they first came out. Chamber was close to maximum SAMMI, but less than a Gustaf that I  had. Cases from the fired '96 would not chamber in the Remington. FWIW.

Attached Files

Scearcy posted this 03 March 2019

I am thinking Lapua cases in a factory chamber should mitigate many issues. Bullet fit, twist rate, etc these are normal problems.

BTW, everyone I found another very good article on shooting cast in a 6.5x55. Larry's article and now this one are going in the front of my 6.5x55 notebook.

"CAST BULLETS IN THE 6.5X55 SWEDISH MAUSER" by Glen Fryxell  Source: The Art and Science of Bullet Casting

Dated April 1, 2017

Attached Files

shastaboat posted this 09 March 2019

I worked for 2 years getting my sporter 96 to shoot cast.  Started with 266469 bullet and was bending them when sizing/lubing them.  No accuracy and keyholing.  Found a discontinued 266455 mold that solved the trick   Also found that 1700 fps was the trick and loading just kissing the lands.  Finally was able to shoot 1" groups at 100 yards.

Because I said so!

Attached Files

bdrake71 posted this 26 May 2019

50 yard results with 170gr LEE bullet and M96 military rifle
First cast load and trip to the range with my 1906 made Swedish M96 model rifle.

50 yards using an NRA SR-1 100 yard target center.  
Frontier Brass, Winchester Large Rifle Primer
LEE 170gr Swedish mold from Midsouth Shooters Supply.  Poly coated, gaschecked and sized at .266
30.5gr of IMR 4831 with a reduction formula velocity estimated at 1800fps. I need to run it over the Chrony as the m96 long barrel probably will have an impact on actual achieved velocity.
The recoil was negligible and the bore was not loaded with powder granules which indicated to me a complete burn of the slow powder.
The target stand was tilted forward due to the slope of impact berm so I don't feel the bullets are tipping with this load as some have stated this mold design can lead too.
I think its a good start on developing a more accurate load for this rifle.  I shall try to get back to the gun club soon with this bullet and load reset into a ladder test.

Bruce

Attached Files

Ken Campbell Iowa posted this 27 May 2019

bdrake71 ...  i give myself a  handicap of about 3 moa when using the military sights on these , so your early results are even better than you might think.    i often think the usa could have done worse than adopt the swede's cartridge creation ... we would probably still be using it.

ken

Attached Files

shastaboat posted this 29 May 2019

Larry Gibson has given a very good review of the 6.5x55 cartridge as is relates to the Swedish Mauser 96 rifles it was chambered in.  I have made some comments that support his findings.  The best bullet for shooting cast in this case and rifles is the Lyman 266455 if you can find one. It is discontinued.  I purchased mine from Eric at http://www.hollowpointmold.com/ 10+ years ago after failing to get any decent results form Lyman 266469.  My 266455 mold is unique that it has 2 gas check cuts, one above the other.  I have no idea if the mold design was intentional or a mistake but it shoots very well as can be seen in the attached pic.

Because I said so!

Attached Files

shastaboat posted this 29 May 2019

Here is a pic of my M96 with an ultra light pencil thin military straight taper barrel to 16.5" and weights 6.5 lbs fully loaded with 5 rounds.  I converted it with a Dayton Traister to cock on opening and adjustable trigger.  The stock is a blind magazine design and eliminates the military magazine trigger guard.  The rifle is fantastic to carry in the field but difficult to hold steady because of it's light muzzle weight.  I've attached a pic of the rifle and also of one of my very successful targets with data noted.  Also the camera that I used to take the above cartridge pic will not focus very well but you can clearly see the 2 gas check cuts.  The top cut just acts as an additional lube groove.  The velocity averages about 1675 fps with measured ES of 11-15 fps from different days shooting.  My conclusion is also that the Lyman 266455 bullet at 120 gr is probably the best bullet design for the fast twist Swede but velocity needs to be reduced to the 1650-1700 fps level.  The Lyman 266469 140 gr, tends to bend when sizing/lubing and is a poor design.  Maybe cast in straight lino it would not bend.  I've heard of the cruise missile bullet design but because it is also a long skinny heavy bullet I doubt it's success.  My 266455 mold is NOT for sale...lol...

Because I said so!

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • M3 Mitch
BigMan54 posted this 01 June 2019

My DAD had a '96 when I was a kid, he used Norma brass, neck-sized in a 310 die. Cast the #266469 of Pure Lino in a 1cav mold. I remember press fitting the bright yellow gas checks, then Lubing the bullets by hand. No sizing of the bullet at all. Seated using a 310 die. Can't remember the powder, but this was the only Rifle/Cartridge we loaded in this fashion. 

And GOD help you if anything happened to one of those Norma cases. I do remember the Loads were pretty HOT. That steel buttplate HURT my 10yr old bony shoulder. even with the folded handtowel.

Long time Caster/Reloader, Getting back into it after almost 10yrs. Life Member NRA 40+yrs, Life S.A.S.S. #375. Does this mean a description of me as a fumble-fingered knuckle-draggin' baboon. I also drool in my sleep. I firmly believe that true happiness is a warm gun. Did I mention how much I HATE auto-correct on this blasted tablet.

Attached Files

harleyrock posted this 01 June 2019

Larry Gibson:

WOW!  I don't have a 6.5 Swede but that treatise is good mojo for any cast bullet load development.

I have a Kimber 84M in 260 Remington that I have not tried to develop a cast load for.  It presents the opposite of the Swede's long throat problem.  It has a very short throat.  It is likely to be hard to find a bullet that will keep it's base inside the cartridge neck.  I suppose a bore riding neck would be imperative.

I have enough trouble developing CB loads for cartridges that are supposed to be easy to load.

Lifetime NRA since 1956, NRA Benefactor, USN Member, CBA Member

Attached Files

bdrake71 posted this 03 June 2019

100 yard test today with the 170gr Lee Cruise Missile and the same load detailed before (30.5gr of IMR 4831 with a reduction formula velocity estimated at 1800fps).  at 100 yards, I had to place the rear sight one notch up from the 300 yard setting to hit the black consistently.  At round count 105-110, I started to get some tumbling so I'm going to scrub out the bore tomorrow to see if the polymer paint or simply carbon buildup from the powder was causing the occasional tumble.  That said, I'll also start miking the bullets more often as well to prevent any possible thin-for-diameter bullets from cold molds being used which might be a reason for the two flyers.



last string of polymer coated 170s.  Next string of 140gr Sierra MKs were right back to grouping.

previous groups were pretty good also without the flyers.

Bruce

Attached Files

JeffinNZ posted this 03 June 2019

What alloy are you using Bruce?  My Carcano will not shoot well above 14-1500fps with less than about 14 BHN and my twist is slower than yours.

Cheers from New Zealand

Attached Files

bdrake71 posted this 04 June 2019

Jeff, the alloy is 2.5lbs of Magnum Shot, 2.5lb of Rotometals Superhard and 5lbs of range lead in my Lee 10lb pot.  The Lead formula chart says with those percentages are as follows.  Its not quite as hard as straight linotype but harder than hardball alloy. 

Tin%     Antimony%   Arsenic%  Copper% Silver% Lead%    Weight        Est. Hardness
0.08%   9.50%           0.31%       0.00%     0.00%    90.1%     10.0lbs       17.4

Each bullet also gets two coats of polymer paint: once before the gas check is put on and it is initially sized at .266 with a LEE-style sizing die and the second coat is done to seal the gas check in place while also providing some more poly coating and again sized back to .266. The bore today went like "new" with just a few strokes of the bore brush and some cleaning squares of cloth.

I'm only punching paper with this bullet so I'm not concerned if it doesn't expand but the long shank will probably cause it to tumble should it hit a bone in the deer if I take it hunting.

Attached Files

JeffinNZ posted this 04 June 2019

HHMMMM.   I would have thought that hard enough.

Cheers from New Zealand

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • bdrake71
bdrake71 posted this 05 June 2019

the bullets weren't bent from the mold.  I think I missed some thin for diameter bullets in my QC check before poly-coating them.  I like the mold so far but will be testing the next range trip with the 6.5mm molds I already own (100gr 266405, 125gr 266455 and the 140gr 266469).  the smallest bullet will probably have a huge jump to the rifle's rifling but we shall see how it goes.

The lead is very hard and the poly coat definitely helps with it as well.

Bruce

Attached Files

Close